<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 911 Truth News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://911truthnews.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://911truthnews.com</link>
	<description>911 truth, 9/11 news, September 11th facts, videos, photos, action, quotes, hit pieces, links. Avoiding conspiracy theory and disinformation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on London-based Oil Executive Linked to 9/11 Hijackers by Jon Gold</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/london-based-oil-executive-linked-to-911-hijackers/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5954#comment-594</guid>
		<description>http://www.browardbulldog.org/2012/02/fbi-informant-says-sarasota-saudi-praised-bin-laden-knew-ex-broward-qaeda-suspect/

http://www.browardbulldog.org/2012/02/graham-fbis-public-statements-are-in-conflict-with-still-secret-records-of-sarasota-911-probe/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.browardbulldog.org/2012/02/fbi-informant-says-sarasota-saudi-praised-bin-laden-knew-ex-broward-qaeda-suspect/" rel="nofollow">http://www.browardbulldog.org/2012/02/fbi-informant-says-sarasota-saudi-praised-bin-laden-knew-ex-broward-qaeda-suspect/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.browardbulldog.org/2012/02/graham-fbis-public-statements-are-in-conflict-with-still-secret-records-of-sarasota-911-probe/" rel="nofollow">http://www.browardbulldog.org/2012/02/graham-fbis-public-statements-are-in-conflict-with-still-secret-records-of-sarasota-911-probe/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Protocols of Jonathan Kay by xxWesxx</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/the-protocols-of-jonathan-kay/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>xxWesxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5140#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Having an education in Media Studies, I have not only learned about the use of propaganda, but also the entire study on the theory of it, as well as other media strategy. One of the easiest ways to convey your message is to attach it to human emotions that can begin to wear down the rational &#039;roadblock&#039; many people have set up to prevent them from being dooped into something against their will. Your use of Jonathan Kay&#039;s article in the National Post about his experience with (although you conveniently portray it to be as though Kay reported on all the actions, not just what he witnessed) the police actions of the G20 summit; is nothing short of this tactic. Here you portray Kay as dishonest by painting a picture of him as someone who is okay with police brutality, prior to just focus on the book you are claiming to critique. 

Furthermore; one can also note your lack of experience with Canada, the place in which Kay was reporting on in your statement about the police and state agreeing with him. 

Of course, seeing as I am neither supporting your opinion of 9/11 &quot;Truth&quot; nor your opinion on a book that criticizes the mental and psychological impacts that lead someone to believe in such conspiracies (as that is all they really are), I hardly believe this will remain on your site for long anyways. Nonetheless, I do know from personal experience as well as education in the field of media studies and psychology, that conspirators, even those of the 9/11 &quot;Truth&quot; movement are actually not confident in their beliefs as they attempt to appear; and so I am writing this to let you know that there are in fact people who do have a rational ability to see through your charade and are not falling victim to your propagandist attempt to persuade an easily manipulative populist mind of what you have come to mask your insecurities about living in a world in which you are not in total control, and will not fall for your conspiracies.

If you are uncertain of how propaganda works still; allow me to demonstrate an obvious attempted piece of propaganda. When attempting to critique a book that serves to prevent irrational thought from taking over your movement of 9/11, before discussing the book you state:

&quot;We know now, of course, that the police were engaged in widespread brutality and violations of civil liberties all over Toronto that day. But Jonathan Kay didn’t see any of it and, so, of course, the police acted with “extraordinary professionalism.” Or perhaps he would argue that a little head-bashing and snatch-and-grabbery is not really violence, as in, you know, violence, and the police and state agree with him, and so that is that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having an education in Media Studies, I have not only learned about the use of propaganda, but also the entire study on the theory of it, as well as other media strategy. One of the easiest ways to convey your message is to attach it to human emotions that can begin to wear down the rational &#8216;roadblock&#8217; many people have set up to prevent them from being dooped into something against their will. Your use of Jonathan Kay&#8217;s article in the National Post about his experience with (although you conveniently portray it to be as though Kay reported on all the actions, not just what he witnessed) the police actions of the G20 summit; is nothing short of this tactic. Here you portray Kay as dishonest by painting a picture of him as someone who is okay with police brutality, prior to just focus on the book you are claiming to critique. </p>
<p>Furthermore; one can also note your lack of experience with Canada, the place in which Kay was reporting on in your statement about the police and state agreeing with him. </p>
<p>Of course, seeing as I am neither supporting your opinion of 9/11 &#8220;Truth&#8221; nor your opinion on a book that criticizes the mental and psychological impacts that lead someone to believe in such conspiracies (as that is all they really are), I hardly believe this will remain on your site for long anyways. Nonetheless, I do know from personal experience as well as education in the field of media studies and psychology, that conspirators, even those of the 9/11 &#8220;Truth&#8221; movement are actually not confident in their beliefs as they attempt to appear; and so I am writing this to let you know that there are in fact people who do have a rational ability to see through your charade and are not falling victim to your propagandist attempt to persuade an easily manipulative populist mind of what you have come to mask your insecurities about living in a world in which you are not in total control, and will not fall for your conspiracies.</p>
<p>If you are uncertain of how propaganda works still; allow me to demonstrate an obvious attempted piece of propaganda. When attempting to critique a book that serves to prevent irrational thought from taking over your movement of 9/11, before discussing the book you state:</p>
<p>&#8220;We know now, of course, that the police were engaged in widespread brutality and violations of civil liberties all over Toronto that day. But Jonathan Kay didn’t see any of it and, so, of course, the police acted with “extraordinary professionalism.” Or perhaps he would argue that a little head-bashing and snatch-and-grabbery is not really violence, as in, you know, violence, and the police and state agree with him, and so that is that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip&#8221; &#8211; A Participant&#8217;s Perspective by deasun</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/911-conspiracy-roadtrip-a-participants-perspective/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>deasun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5688#comment-591</guid>
		<description>I am glad you did the show for me wasn&#039;t all bad. I am sure many people watching the show  like myself and thought later, let me check out this stuff , once it ended.
After the show I felt that I understood events more. Or so it seemed. It almost became &quot;a case proven&quot; from it Yet   some weeks later am here because no longer a case proven.
After reading and looking at others take on the events, the events remain still unclear, the evidence offered doesn&#039;t work out all the time when I checked it online. 
The pancaking of the towers on the viewing of your show,  made sense, and the stuff to do with the fire. made sense, however when you look at evidence found else were, it fails to stand up. I was left not getting it again,  becuase buildings don&#039;t come down like that without some sort of assistance.

 I have one question and its not covered any place. Not what happened, that to me is a circle,  people go on and on about it, as i think in order to answer that,you need to look for the persons firing the guns. One should understand that a gun will not kill anyone but a person holding it will. If 9/11 is indeed a giant smoking gun, then in other words, we need to look behind it, to find the audit trail of people, and money and equipment that allowed it to  operate.

That for me is the route for investigation and the rest will fall into place, if its prove these persons exist.  For example to plant the explosives, if used in the twin towers, takes time and trouble. Therfore you need to do a audit trail on people and equipment. You cant ignore this to prove the case. They would of course be paid and of course have families. So one would imagine they sleep well at night? This to me is the leaking boat theory. You cant keep these events quite.After ten year&#039;s someone will speak out if not then they do not exist. As People lose jobs, drink to much, take drugs its a fact,  if they exist they  would number many,  some of them would by now have said something, this line of enquiry must make sense.

I think we need  blogs and websites suggesting people who did this, more the who and where, and money required, you ant going to do stuff like this for less than a few hundred million, and a few thousand  persons. Am the same with any case related to a conspiracy. I want the people  named together with the evidence, its important but  for me I want the people exposed as no event without people can happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you did the show for me wasn&#8217;t all bad. I am sure many people watching the show  like myself and thought later, let me check out this stuff , once it ended.<br />
After the show I felt that I understood events more. Or so it seemed. It almost became &#8220;a case proven&#8221; from it Yet   some weeks later am here because no longer a case proven.<br />
After reading and looking at others take on the events, the events remain still unclear, the evidence offered doesn&#8217;t work out all the time when I checked it online.<br />
The pancaking of the towers on the viewing of your show,  made sense, and the stuff to do with the fire. made sense, however when you look at evidence found else were, it fails to stand up. I was left not getting it again,  becuase buildings don&#8217;t come down like that without some sort of assistance.</p>
<p> I have one question and its not covered any place. Not what happened, that to me is a circle,  people go on and on about it, as i think in order to answer that,you need to look for the persons firing the guns. One should understand that a gun will not kill anyone but a person holding it will. If 9/11 is indeed a giant smoking gun, then in other words, we need to look behind it, to find the audit trail of people, and money and equipment that allowed it to  operate.</p>
<p>That for me is the route for investigation and the rest will fall into place, if its prove these persons exist.  For example to plant the explosives, if used in the twin towers, takes time and trouble. Therfore you need to do a audit trail on people and equipment. You cant ignore this to prove the case. They would of course be paid and of course have families. So one would imagine they sleep well at night? This to me is the leaking boat theory. You cant keep these events quite.After ten year&#8217;s someone will speak out if not then they do not exist. As People lose jobs, drink to much, take drugs its a fact,  if they exist they  would number many,  some of them would by now have said something, this line of enquiry must make sense.</p>
<p>I think we need  blogs and websites suggesting people who did this, more the who and where, and money required, you ant going to do stuff like this for less than a few hundred million, and a few thousand  persons. Am the same with any case related to a conspiracy. I want the people  named together with the evidence, its important but  for me I want the people exposed as no event without people can happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gawker: Chief of CIA’s Global Jihad Unit Revealed Online by Jon Gold</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/gawker-chief-of-cia%e2%80%99s-global-jihad-unit-revealed-online/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5882#comment-589</guid>
		<description>The CIA might want to listen to 9/11 Commissioner Thomas Kean who was interviewed for &quot;Who Is Rich Blee?&quot; when he said this was one of the most &quot;troubling aspects&quot; of the 9/11 Report (in a footnote in the back of the report), and asked &quot;does it surprise you that the CIA was brought up to lie?&quot;

The CIA may want to read the CIA Inspector General&#039;s report that suggests that people &quot;failed to meet an acceptable standard of performance, and recommends that an internal review board review their conduct for possible disciplinary action,&quot; and ask Porter Goss why he refused to release the report, and &quot;asked Helgerson to modify the report to avoid drawing conclusions about whether individual CIA officers should be held accountable.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA might want to listen to 9/11 Commissioner Thomas Kean who was interviewed for &#8220;Who Is Rich Blee?&#8221; when he said this was one of the most &#8220;troubling aspects&#8221; of the 9/11 Report (in a footnote in the back of the report), and asked &#8220;does it surprise you that the CIA was brought up to lie?&#8221;</p>
<p>The CIA may want to read the CIA Inspector General&#8217;s report that suggests that people &#8220;failed to meet an acceptable standard of performance, and recommends that an internal review board review their conduct for possible disciplinary action,&#8221; and ask Porter Goss why he refused to release the report, and &#8220;asked Helgerson to modify the report to avoid drawing conclusions about whether individual CIA officers should be held accountable.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip&#8221; &#8211; A Participant&#8217;s Perspective by ken</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/911-conspiracy-roadtrip-a-participants-perspective/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5688#comment-585</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Andrew Maxwell who believes the 9/11 commission report was the be all and end all of the 9/11 story.&quot;  &lt;/i&gt;

And people like that call me a conspiracy theorist?  I have no idea who is actually behind all the planning and execution of those terrible attacks on September 11th 2001.  What I do know is neither do most other people including the members of the 9/11 commission. How do I know?  Well it is NOT due to a conspiracy theory.  I know because the authors of that report, the commission members, including, but not limited to, the co chairs and the chief legal council to the commission have all come out and distanced themselves from that report because &quot;it is not the truth!&quot;

That is their words, not mine.

SO, I am not telling anyone what really happened that day because I do not know.  Thing is, nobody knows because the official report is not the truth, and is therefore just another conspiracy theory.  

In fact every theory that exists in the public domain about 9/11 is a conspiracy theory.  Some contain more truth than others, but there is no definitive absolute proof of what happened that day, how and why, and it is a travesty that there isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Andrew Maxwell who believes the 9/11 commission report was the be all and end all of the 9/11 story.&#8221;  </i></p>
<p>And people like that call me a conspiracy theorist?  I have no idea who is actually behind all the planning and execution of those terrible attacks on September 11th 2001.  What I do know is neither do most other people including the members of the 9/11 commission. How do I know?  Well it is NOT due to a conspiracy theory.  I know because the authors of that report, the commission members, including, but not limited to, the co chairs and the chief legal council to the commission have all come out and distanced themselves from that report because &#8220;it is not the truth!&#8221;</p>
<p>That is their words, not mine.</p>
<p>SO, I am not telling anyone what really happened that day because I do not know.  Thing is, nobody knows because the official report is not the truth, and is therefore just another conspiracy theory.  </p>
<p>In fact every theory that exists in the public domain about 9/11 is a conspiracy theory.  Some contain more truth than others, but there is no definitive absolute proof of what happened that day, how and why, and it is a travesty that there isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Identity of CIA Officer Behind 9/11 &amp; Torture Cases Revealed by Jon Gold</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/identity-of-cia-official-behind-911-and-torture-cases-revealed/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5873#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Alfreda Frances Bikowsky – http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=redheaded_cia_manager_1

Michael Anne Casey – http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=michelle_1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alfreda Frances Bikowsky – <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=redheaded_cia_manager_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=redheaded_cia_manager_1</a></p>
<p>Michael Anne Casey – <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=michelle_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=michelle_1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip&#8221; &#8211; A Participant&#8217;s Perspective by scrunger</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/911-conspiracy-roadtrip-a-participants-perspective/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>scrunger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5688#comment-581</guid>
		<description>@Chrismp &quot; I’m not a believer of the ’911 truth’ story, and personally I find it to be -generally- ridiculous.&quot; ...........  &quot;Just a guess – and I’m NO expert!&quot;

You do not have to be an expert.......  for heavens sake.     Just a little common sense!

                                   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chrismp &#8221; I’m not a believer of the ’911 truth’ story, and personally I find it to be -generally- ridiculous.&#8221; &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..  &#8220;Just a guess – and I’m NO expert!&#8221;</p>
<p>You do not have to be an expert&#8230;&#8230;.  for heavens sake.     Just a little common sense!</p>
<p>                                   <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip&#8221; &#8211; A Participant&#8217;s Perspective by Vinny Eastwood</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/911-conspiracy-roadtrip-a-participants-perspective/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny Eastwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5688#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I applaud you for going on the hit piece any way and it was a good experience to see how lies are perpetuated by scumbags working for major propaganda platforms. In future do the Alex Jones method and tell them you&#039;re not interested in being part of a hit piece. He who controls the editing controls the story and anything you say can and will be used against you int he court of public opinion.
Let&#039;s have the truth shall we? No mention of Charlie Veitch in this article I presume it&#039;s because you don&#039;t want to get involved in the nastiness of it. Good on you!
I&#039;ve called him out and gotten abusive swearing emails from him when I was acting like any mate would when they see their friends in the wrong. I don&#039;t believe 9/11 was an inside job, but I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s not either!
Why Charlie became so abusive to truthers after this road trip I do not know.
I&#039;ve made 2 videos discussing this if you care to see,

Charlie Veitch attacks conspiracy theorists, Why? MR NEWS
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNNj7Ec9TIw

Charlie Veitch, why is he acting like an a**hole? MR NEWS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAdAyn4gNuo

We observed a moment of silence for the families and first responders at our 9/11 truth action to remember their courage and remember their loved ones who live on with a heart heavy from crimes covered up by the very people supposed to protect them!

Thanks all, and I hope we get to the truth of this before it becomes resigned as official history forever.

Vinny &quot;MR NEWS&quot; Eastwood
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud you for going on the hit piece any way and it was a good experience to see how lies are perpetuated by scumbags working for major propaganda platforms. In future do the Alex Jones method and tell them you&#8217;re not interested in being part of a hit piece. He who controls the editing controls the story and anything you say can and will be used against you int he court of public opinion.<br />
Let&#8217;s have the truth shall we? No mention of Charlie Veitch in this article I presume it&#8217;s because you don&#8217;t want to get involved in the nastiness of it. Good on you!<br />
I&#8217;ve called him out and gotten abusive swearing emails from him when I was acting like any mate would when they see their friends in the wrong. I don&#8217;t believe 9/11 was an inside job, but I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s not either!<br />
Why Charlie became so abusive to truthers after this road trip I do not know.<br />
I&#8217;ve made 2 videos discussing this if you care to see,</p>
<p>Charlie Veitch attacks conspiracy theorists, Why? MR NEWS<br />
 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNNj7Ec9TIw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNNj7Ec9TIw</a></p>
<p>Charlie Veitch, why is he acting like an a**hole? MR NEWS<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAdAyn4gNuo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAdAyn4gNuo</a></p>
<p>We observed a moment of silence for the families and first responders at our 9/11 truth action to remember their courage and remember their loved ones who live on with a heart heavy from crimes covered up by the very people supposed to protect them!</p>
<p>Thanks all, and I hope we get to the truth of this before it becomes resigned as official history forever.</p>
<p>Vinny &#8220;MR NEWS&#8221; Eastwood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Funded 9/11? Families &amp; Insurers Still Want Answers by cosmos</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/who-funded-911-families-and-insurers-still-want-answers/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5851#comment-579</guid>
		<description>http://911truthnews.com/lloyds-insurers-drop-911-related-claims-lawsuit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://911truthnews.com/lloyds-insurers-drop-911-related-claims-lawsuit" rel="nofollow">http://911truthnews.com/lloyds-insurers-drop-911-related-claims-lawsuit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sibel Edmonds Interviews Paul Thompson by cosmos</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/sibel-edmonds-interviews-paul-thompson/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 03:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5613#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Interview with Paul Thompson Part III &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/podpress_trac/play/6704/0/BF.0056.Thompson.pt3_20110915.mp3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MP3&lt;/a&gt; [ 1:03:21 ]

Paul Thompson joins us to discuss one of the most blacked-out and censored aspects of Al-Qaeda-CIA connections: The partnership and alliance between the CIA and Al Qaeda and their joint operations in Central Asia, Balkans and Caucasus throughout the 1990’s. Mr. Thompson talks about Al-Qaeda’s Balkans operations, running training camps, money-laundering, and drug running networks in the region, Ayman Al-Zawahiri and his residence in Bulgaria in order to help manage the Al Qaeda effort in nearby Bosnia, the Al Qaeda cells in Chechnya and Azerbaijan, BCCI and more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interview with Paul Thompson Part III <a href="http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/podpress_trac/play/6704/0/BF.0056.Thompson.pt3_20110915.mp3" rel="nofollow">MP3</a> [ 1:03:21 ]</p>
<p>Paul Thompson joins us to discuss one of the most blacked-out and censored aspects of Al-Qaeda-CIA connections: The partnership and alliance between the CIA and Al Qaeda and their joint operations in Central Asia, Balkans and Caucasus throughout the 1990’s. Mr. Thompson talks about Al-Qaeda’s Balkans operations, running training camps, money-laundering, and drug running networks in the region, Ayman Al-Zawahiri and his residence in Bulgaria in order to help manage the Al Qaeda effort in nearby Bosnia, the Al Qaeda cells in Chechnya and Azerbaijan, BCCI and more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

