Comments on: Counterpunch: A Kinder, Gentler Hit Piece

By: Julian

Julian — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:10:36 +0000

Vic, same recommendation I offered to John below. Threads are less repetitive and more conversational if we use the nested commenting. It’s not critical, but something to consider.

By: Julian

Julian — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:05:59 +0000

It limits repeated content as you may not need to quote and it makes threads easier to read.

By: Julian

Julian — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:03:24 +0000

Reply to a reply. 🙂

By: Julian

Julian — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:03:00 +0000

I like to recommend utilizing our nested commenting system, allowing you to …

By: JohnA

JohnA — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:41:46 +0000

“But FOX has also been telling us about Able Danger recently…”

yes – but they framed it as another example of how Clinton is to blame for 9/11.

By: Victoria

Victoria — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:15:51 +0000

>>First this story setting up CD as our main issue. Then a special or “debate” that appears to be opening up a discussion on the issue but is really set up to simply make our ‘one issue’ go away.

I think you’re right in the sense that they want to lock up everything into one issue and then make it go away. B7 will be one of the easiest to do, not because of demolition or physical evidence vs whatever, but because it really can be isolated as a spur of the moment decision, or just another corruption scandal, a way to cash in on the insurance, etc., etc.

Our challenge is to lock Building 7 TOGETHER with a handful (not dozens and dozens) of other obvious lies and not LET them be separated. Building 7 needs to be used by us to expose MORE truths, just like they will use it to try to shut it all down. They understand, on some level also, that they can’t ignore it anymore, so they will use it, and so should we.

By: cosmos

cosmos — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:14:53 +0000

But FOX has also been telling us about Able Danger recently...

By: JohnA

JohnA — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:43:57 +0000

I see that our critics – and opponents of the truth (like FoxNews) – are veeeeery carefully putting all of 9/11 Truth’s eggs into one basket.

Two possibilities here:

1 – FoxNews – and the media at large – actually is beginning to see the light and wants to offer truly fair and balanced reporting on the irrefutable, indisputable be-all and end-all of all heavyweight champions of 9/11 Truth evidence – controlled demolition… wooo hooo!!

2 – (use some deductive reasoning to fill in the blanks here)

By: Julian

Julian — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:17:39 +0000

Well said. I’m with you up to ‘explosives’ I wouldn’t want to summarize the entire movement as facts about demolition. That’s, in fact, one of the things Geraldo very carefully did during his spot, suggest that demolition is the only possibly credible angle we have.

There are only two reasons I can think that FOX would run this story. First that they are pandering to their younger audience that probably pays more attention to Alex Jones than Glen Beck. Second, that they are setting us up to take us down. First this story setting up CD as our main issue. Then a special or “debate” that appears to be opening up a discussion on the issue but is really set up to simply make our ‘one issue’ go away.

The third non-option is that Geraldo just trashed his credibility on principle. 😀

By: albert lucientes

albert lucientes — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:43:35 +0000

When people talk like this about 9/11 they reveal their profound ignorance on the subject to those of us who have actually looked at the facts. However complicated and ‘conspiratorial’ 9-11 may be, it is in fact but a short list of clearly documented facts that conclusively reveal the use of explosives.