Comments on: Pentagon Burns Copies of Book Revealing "Able Danger"

By: Julian

Julian — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:03:23 +0000

‘Operation Dark Heart’: Comparing The Censored Version With The Real Thing

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/29/operation-dark-heart-comp_n_744123.html?ir=Politics

By: Jon Gold

Jon Gold — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:28:15 +0000

To me, that is as partisan an attack as you can get. However, 9/11 Justice is non-partisan. As Tony Shaffer will tell you, Able Danger involves both the Clinton and Bush Administrations.

http://911truthnews.com/the-facts-speak-for-themselves/#fact49

By: cosmos

cosmos — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:16:10 +0000

The Washington Times: EDITORIAL: 9/11 cover-up

By: cosmos

cosmos — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:32:49 +0000

AFP coverage via Raw Story:

Pentagon: Our observers made sure publisher destroyed 10,000 books

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/pentagon-observers-publisher-destroyed-10000-books

Notice there’s no mention of Philip Zelikow or even Able Danger.

By: Jon Gold

Jon Gold — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:43:54 +0000

Able Danger does several things. It shows how illegitimate the 9/11 Commission was. It is another example that shows information pertaining to the alleged hijackers was known to elements within our Government. It brings Philip Zelikow, and the CIA’s relationship to the ISI into the spotlight. It is another example that shows there IS a 9/11 Cover-Up.

And don’t forget it also brings up retaliation against whistleblowers, obstruction of justice, etc… And the topic of 9/11 Whistleblowers in general. It also exposes the Pentagon’s Inspector General.

http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showpost.php?p=96865&postcount=1