Comments on: Richard Falk Responds to The Lobby’s Vilification http://911truthnews.com/richard-falk-responds-to-the-lobbys-vilification/ Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:40:07 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25 By: nonfictreader http://911truthnews.com/richard-falk-responds-to-the-lobbys-vilification/#comment-282 Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:47:17 +0000 http://911truthnews.com/?p=4495#comment-282 Is this the same Richard Falk that wrote the foreward to David Ray Griffin’s “New Pearl Harbor”? To quote: “There are so many gaping holes in the official accounts of 9/11 that no plausible coherent narrative remains, and until now we have been staggering forward as if the truth about these traumatic events no longer mattered.” Quite a different tune than raising “some doubts in the most cautious language”.
Jason Haberl, Johnstown PA

]]> By: tonywicher http://911truthnews.com/richard-falk-responds-to-the-lobbys-vilification/#comment-281 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:58:17 +0000 http://911truthnews.com/?p=4495#comment-281 Professor Falk,

Anyone who has “objectively examined the evidence” publicly available at ae911truth.org knows more than that there are “gaps” in the official account of 9/11. One who has made such an examination knows that the WTC buildings were demolished with explosives. Those who are calling you despicable and offensive murdered 3000
people on 9/11. The forensic evidence establishes explosive demolition beyond a reasonable doubt. If you have not read the physics and chemistry papers available there to satisfy yourself, please do so now, and stop being defensive about questioning the government account of 9/11. Do not allow these lying CIA stooges intimidate you.

Tony Wicher
Lake Arrowhead, CA

]]>