
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Ellsberg &#8211; 9/11 Truth News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://911truthnews.com/tag/daniel-ellsberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://911truthnews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 02:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Pentagon Papers Whistleblowers for 9/11 Truth</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/pentagon-papers-whistleblowers-call-for-new-911-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/pentagon-papers-whistleblowers-call-for-new-911-investigation/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post (540x324)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Ellsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Gravel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=3979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Ellsberg <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5260">says</a>  that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "<span style="font-style: italic;">far more explosive  than the Pentagon Papers</span>".  Senator Mike Gravel told <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/09/gravel-considering-obama-primary-challenge-calls-for-new-911-investigation/">the Daily Caller</a> this week:</p>
</p>
<blockquote><p>Individuals in and out of government may certainly have participated  with the obviously known perpetrators of this dastardly act. Suspicions  abound over the analysis presented by government.  Obviously an act that  has triggered three wars, Afghan, Iraqi and the continuing War on  Terror, should be extensively investigated which was not done and which  the government avoids addressing.</p></blockquote>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/pentagon-papers-whistleblowers-call-for-new-911-investigation/">Pentagon Papers Whistleblowers for 9/11 Truth</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main players in releasing the Pentagon Papers were Daniel Ellsberg and Senator Mike Gravel.</p>
<p>Ellsberg is, of course, the former military analyst and famed whistleblower who smuggled the Pentagon Papers out of the Rand Corporation. </p>
<p>Senator Gravel is the person who read the Pentagon Papers into the Congressional Record.  This act made the papers public record, so that they could not be censored by the government. </p>
<p>Ellsberg and Gravel are receiving a lot of media attention right now for their support of Wikileaks.</p>
<p>But little attention has been paid to Ellsberg and Gravel&#8217;s support for a new 9/11 investigation.</p>
<p>Ellsberg <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5260">says</a>  that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is &#8220;<span style="font-style: italic;">far more explosive  than the Pentagon Papers</span>&#8220;. (<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/7/31/760117/-Bombshell:-Bin-Laden-worked-for-US-till-9-11">Here&#8217;s some</a> of what that whistleblower says.)</p>
<p>He also said that the government is <span style="font-style: italic;">ordering  </span>the media to cover up her  allegations about 9/11.</p>
<p>And he said that some  of the claims concerning  government involvement in 9/11 are credible,  that &#8220;very serious  questions have been raised about what they [U.S.  government officials]  knew beforehand and how much involvement there  might have been&#8221;, that  engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or  psychologically beyond the  scope of those in office, and that  there&#8217;s enough evidence  to justify a new, &#8220;hard-hitting&#8221; investigation  into 9/11 with subpoenas  and testimony taken under oath (see <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJhWhItqYCc">this</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VirlkZq1pLY">this</a>).</p>
<p>Senator Gravel has <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE6XLYfAhG0&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2F911blogger%2Ecom%2Fnode%2F10561">long supported</a> a new 9/11 investigation.  Gravel told <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/09/gravel-considering-obama-primary-challenge-calls-for-new-911-investigation/">the Daily Caller</a> this week:</p>
</p>
<blockquote><p>Individuals in and out of government may certainly have participated  with the obviously known perpetrators of this dastardly act. Suspicions  abound over the analysis presented by government.  Obviously an act that  has triggered three wars, Afghan, Iraqi and the continuing War on  Terror, should be extensively investigated which was not done and which  the government avoids addressing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Other high-level whistleblowers have alleged a cover-up as well.   </p>
<p>For example, Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official Karen Kwiatkowski &#8211; who <a href="http://www.laweekly.com/2004-02-19/news/soldier-for-the-truth/">blew the whistle</a> on the Bush administration&#8217;s efforts to concoct false intelligence about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction &#8211; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/11-American-Empire-Intellectuals-Speak/dp/1566566592">wrote</a> (page 26): </p>
<blockquote><p>I  have been told by reporters that they will not report their own  insights or contrary evaluations of the official 9/11 story, because to  question the government story about 9/11 is to question the very  foundations of our entire modern belief system regarding our government,  our country, and our way of life. To be charged with questioning these  foundations is far more serious than being labeled a disgruntled  conspiracy nut or anti-government traitor, or even being sidelined or  marginalized within an academic, government service, or literary career.  To question the official 9/11 story is simply and fundamentally  revolutionary. In this way, of course, questioning the official story is  also simply and fundamentally American.</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed, Ellsberg and Gravel join a long list of <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/09/anniversary-of-911.html">high-level former officials</a> in the government and intelligence services &#8211; including <a href="http://www.nswbc.org/membership_list.htm">many well-known whistleblowers</a> &#8211; who have publicly demanded a new investigation.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/pentagon-papers-whistleblowers-call-for-new-911-investigation/">Pentagon Papers Whistleblowers for 9/11 Truth</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/pentagon-papers-whistleblowers-call-for-new-911-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
