
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>George Bush &#8211; 9/11 Truth News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://911truthnews.com/tag/george-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://911truthnews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 02:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Bush Wondered After 9/11 &#034;Why Didn’t We Know This?’</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/bush-wondered-after-911-why-didnt-we-know-this/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/bush-wondered-after-911-why-didnt-we-know-this/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Tenet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an interview that aired Sunday night, President Bush told National Geographic Channel’s Peter Schnall that after 9/11, he didn’t want to blame intelligence agencies for failing to predict the attacks. “At some point in time in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, I thought about why didn’t we know this?” Bush recalled. “I knew [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/bush-wondered-after-911-why-didnt-we-know-this/">Bush Wondered After 9/11 &quot;Why Didn’t We Know This?’</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview that aired Sunday night, President Bush told National Geographic Channel’s Peter Schnall that after 9/11, he didn’t want to blame intelligence agencies for failing to predict the attacks.</p>
<p>“At some point in time in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, I thought about why didn’t we know this?” Bush recalled. </p>
<p>“I knew we needed to figure out what went wrong to prevent other attacks but I didn’t want start the finger pointing and say to our intelligence communities, ‘You fouled up. You should have caught this. Why didn’t you know?’”</p>
<p>On Aug. 6, 2001 — more than a month before the attacks — Bush received a <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2004-04-10/politics/august6.memo_1_bin-conduct-terrorist-attacks-abu-zubaydah?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS">presidential daily briefing</a> entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”</p>
<p>“Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate bin Laden since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US,” the briefing said. “Bin Laden implied in U.S. television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and ‘bring the fighting to America.’”</p>
<p>“FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.”</p>
<p>The day after receiving the report while vacationing on his ranch, “Bush seemed carefree as he spoke about the books he was reading, the work he was doing on his nearby ranch, his love of hot-weather jogging, his golf game and his 55th birthday,” <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;contentId=A2676-2004Apr10&amp;notFound=true">according to <em>The Washington Post</em></a>.</p>
<p>On at least two other occasions in August 2001, CIA Director George Tenet also <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2098861/">reportedly</a> briefed Bush on terrorist threats.</p>
<p>Watch this video from National Geographic Channel, broadcast Aug. 28, 2011.</p>
<p><embed src="http://rawreplaymedia.com/fvp/flvplayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" flashvars="image=http://rawreplaymedia.com/media/2011/1105/ng_bush_911_pdb_110828a.jpg&amp;file=http://rawreplaymedia.com/media/2011/1105/ng_bush_911_pdb_110828a.flv&amp;logo=http://www.rawreplaymedia.com/fvp/rsvidlogo04.png&amp;link=http://www.rawstory.com&amp;autostart=false&amp;lightcolor=0x557722&amp;backcolor=0x000000&amp;frontcolor=0xCCCCCC&amp;showicons=false" width="480" height="290"></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/bush-wondered-after-911-why-didnt-we-know-this/">Bush Wondered After 9/11 &quot;Why Didn’t We Know This?’</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/bush-wondered-after-911-why-didnt-we-know-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Cheney Claims He &#8211; Not Bush &#8211; Was The Decider</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/dick-cheney-claims-he-not-bush-was-the-decider/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/dick-cheney-claims-he-not-bush-was-the-decider/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 Fahrenheit 911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camp David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Dick Cheney is once again telling everyone how much he loves waterboarding and torture. NBC is teasing an in-depth interview about Cheney&#8217;s new book, In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir, which is being released at the end of August. Other bits and pieces are coming out to help promote the sales of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/dick-cheney-claims-he-not-bush-was-the-decider/">Dick Cheney Claims He &#8211; Not Bush &#8211; Was The Decider</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0rO3F6mZUaE" type="text/javascript" frameborder="0" height="315" width="400"><br />
</iframe></p>
<p>Dick Cheney is once again<a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/cheney-strongly-supports-continued-use-water"> telling everyone how much he loves waterboarding and torture.</a> NBC is teasing an in-depth interview about Cheney&#8217;s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1439176191/crooksandliar-20/ref=nosim/">In <em>My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir</em></a>, which is being released at the end of August. Other bits and pieces are coming out to help promote the sales of the book like this article in the <em>NY Times</em> today: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/us/politics/25cheney.html">Cheney Says He Urged Bush to Bomb Syria in ’07</a></p>
<p>During George Bush&#8217;s entire presidency the question of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/gallery/070622/GAL-07Jun22-78887/">how much influence</a> and authority VP Dick Cheney was given was always been part of the discussion. Cheney openly disdained rules, conventions and laws, pushing the concept of the Unitary Executive further than Nixon ever dreamed.  Was Cheney making all the important policy decisions? Cheney once believed he was highly qualified to be president<a href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24271622.html?dids=24271622:24271622&amp;FMT=ABS&amp;FMTS=ABS:FT&amp;type=current&amp;date=Jan+05%2C+1993&amp;author=Chicago+Tribune+wires.&amp;pub=Chicago+Tribune+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&amp;desc=Cheney+might+run+in+1996+for+president&amp;pqatl=google"> and threw out a trial balloon in 1996</a>.  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Defense Secretary Dick Cheney said Monday he would consider a presidential run in 1996, adding that he worried about U.S. military cuts planned by President-elect Clinton in the face of instability in  Russia.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Red Scare, how predictable. However, he <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1995/01/04/us/cheney-won-t-run-in-96-kemp-likely-to-follow-suit.html">decided not to run after all</a>.</p>
<p>Fast forward to 2000, Cheney conveniently picked himself for the office after he was named to head the search team<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/it-s-vetting-time--20080621"><em> to find a Vice President for Bush&#8217;s ticket.</em></a>  And there was a lot of controversy <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2008/09/hbc-90003554">about how that all went down</a>. (h/t <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2008/09/18/29354/cheney-vp-vet/"><em>ThinkProgress</em></a>)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The news in my book about this process is that Cheney never filled out his own questionnaire; that the heart surgeon who vouched for his health never met him or looked at his records; and that Bush and Cheney never interviewed anyone for the job until Cheney already had it nailed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But what I find most fascinating in the <em>NY Times</em> article is that Cheney actually reveals personal conversations he had with <em>his </em>president as well as many other top Bush aides and advisers. Plus he&#8217;s taking full credit for running the government response to the 9/11 attacks, which makes Bush look weaker than his <em>My Pet Goat</em> seven-minute stare. Cheney was asked by Jamie Gangel of ABC News if Bush would be upset by these reveals, but replied with a nonchalant &#8220;no&#8221;. But just think about what he is admitting to: as the 9/11 attacks were happening, Cheney has no problem revealing in his book that he was running the government response, completely against protocol. </p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>The book opens with an account of <strong>Mr. Cheney’s experiences during the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when he essentially commanded the  government’s response from a bunker beneath the White House while Mr.  Bush — who was away from Washington and hampered by communications  breakdowns — played a peripheral role.</strong> But Mr. Cheney wrote that he did not want to make any formal statement to the nation that day.</strong></p>
<p>“My past government experience,” he wrote, “had prepared me to manage  the crisis during those first few hours on 9/11, but I knew that if I  went out and spoke to the press, it would undermine the president, and  that would be bad for him and for the country.        </p>
<p> “We were at war. Our commander in chief needed to be seen as in charge, strong, and resolute — as George W. Bush was.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bush should have been in control that tragic day, not Cheney, since he was the elected president and was not incapacitated from doing his duties.</p>
<p>The one question that should be asked of George Bush by the media is did he relinquish command and control to Cheney during those precious minutes and hours after the attacks? If yes, why? If the answer is no &#8211; also why? Because these words make it appear that Cheney was indeed much more powerful than Bush was. This was always the rumor and here it is in memoir form and corroborated by the 9/11 Commission Report.</p>
<p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2004/jun/18/nation/na-cheney18">Remember this from the 9/11 Commission Report: Cheney Gave Order to Shoot Down Jets</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Vice President Dick Cheney was huddled with top U.S. officials in a bunker below the White House on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when a  military aide told him that a hijacked aircraft was 80 miles from  Washington and closing in fast. The aide needed to know: Did Cheney want  to give warplanes scrambled over Washington orders to shoot it down? Cheney did not hesitate. He authorized fighter aircraft &#8220;to engage the inbound plane.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps in his haste to act &#8212; President Bush was in Florida at the  time &#8212; Cheney might have shortcut White House protocol, the report  said. The normal chain of command for military &#8220;engage&#8221; orders goes from  the president to the Secretary of Defense, and not through the Vice President, it said.</p>
<p>Although Cheney said he conferred with the president before giving the order, the commission staff could not  confirm that a phone call took place in that time frame. Several minutes  after giving the order, Cheney informed Defense Secretary Donald H.  Rumsfeld that he had done so. &#8220;So we&#8217;ve got a couple of aircraft up there that have those instructions at the present time?&#8221; Rumsfeld asked. &#8220;That  is correct,&#8221; Cheney replied. &#8220;And it&#8217;s my understanding they&#8217;ve already  taken a couple of aircraft out.&#8221; That understanding turned out to be  mistaken.</p>
<p>By then, three hijacked airliners had already been  crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The airliner  Cheney ordered shot down had already been forced by passengers to crash  in a Pennsylvania field. And another seemingly hostile aircraft turned out to be a Medevac helicopter, headed to the Pentagon.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There was a lot of discussion between the secret service and Bush&#8217;s aides about where the President should be because he was <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1340514/Father-defends-Bushs-flight-from-danger.html">vulnerable to looking politically weak for running out of town. </a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>PRESIDENT George Bush Sr came to the defense of his son yesterday amid growing criticism of the president&#8217;s decision not to return immediately to Washington after Tuesday&#8217;s attacks.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That problem was solved because Cheney told Bush that there was a threat against Air Force One so he should stay out of DC which was reported by the <em><a href="http://www.cwalocal4250.org/news/binarydata/9-11%20Government%20Inconsitencies.pdf">WSJ in 2004 (pdf)</a></em>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Once airborne, Mr. Bush spoke again on a secure phone with Mr. Cheney, who relayed a new message that changed the president&#8217;s mind, White House officials later said. The vice president urged Mr. Bush to postpone his return because, Mr. Cheney said, the government had received a specific threat that Air Force One itself had been targeted by terrorists. Mr. Cheney emphasized that the threat included a reference to what he called the secret code word for the presidential jet, &#8220;Angel,&#8221; Mr. Bartlett said in an interview.</p>
<p>Although in the days after Sept. 11, Mr. Cheney and other administration officials recounted that a threat had been received against Air Force One, Mr. Bartlett said in a recent interview that there hadn&#8217;t been any actual threat. Word of a threat had resulted from confusion in the White House bunker, as multiple conversations went on simultaneously, he said. Many of these exchanges, he added, related to rumors that turned out to be false, such as reports of attacks on the president&#8217;s ranch in Texas and the State Department. As for the Air Force One code name, Mr. Bartlett said, &#8220;Somebody was using the word &#8216;angel,&#8217; &#8221; and &#8220;that got interpreted as a threat based on the word &#8216;angel.&#8217; &#8221; (Former Secret Service officials said the code wasn&#8217;t an official secret, but a radio shorthand designation that had been made public well before 2001.)</p>
<p>The vice president&#8217;s office gave an account differing from Mr. Bartlett&#8217;s, saying it still couldn&#8217;t rule out that a threat to Air Force One actually had been made. Days after the attacks, Mr. Cheney had said word of the threat had been passed to him by Secret Service agents. But in interviews, two former senior Secret Service agents on duty that day denied that their agency played any role in receiving or passing on a threat to the presidential jet.</p>
<p>An official in Mr. Cheney&#8217;s office said in an interview that Mr. Cheney had been mistaken in saying the threat came to him via the Secret Service. The official said that instead, Mr. Cheney had received word of the threat from &#8220;a uniformed military person&#8221; manning the underground bunker. The official said the vice president and his staff don&#8217;t know who the individual was. And the official said that he couldn&#8217;t say definitively whether or not a threat had been made. &#8220;I&#8217;m not in a position to know the answer to that question,&#8221; the official in the vice president&#8217;s office said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Telegraph also <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1365455/Revealed-what-really-went-on-during-Bushs-missing-hours.html">reported practically the same news</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The picture changed instantly. No more could the President be accused of sheltering in the safety of far-away Louisiana; now he was a hunted  man &#8211; the main target. Within a week, though, Ari Fleischer, the White  House press secretary, had all but admitted the story was completely  untrue.           </p>
<p>Who cooked it up? Most fingers point at Mr Cheney. &#8220;It did  two things for Dick,&#8221; says a well-informed Washington official. &#8220;It  reinforced his argument that the President should stay out of town, and  it gave George W an excellent reason for doing so.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It also gave Cheney some extra maneuvering room. What&#8217;s also bizarre, but in hindsight doesn&#8217;t come as a surprise is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743260244/crooksandliar-20/ref=nosim/">how Cheney&#8217;s wife</a>, Lynne  <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a1000cheneytaken#a1000cheneytaken">kept interfering with the activities as they were unfolding</a>. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>But Army Major Mike Fenzel, who is also in the PEOC, complains to him, “I can’t hear the crisis conference [that Clarke has been leading]  because Mrs. Cheney keeps turning down the volume on you so she can hear  CNN… and the vice president keeps hanging up the open line to you.” </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Later on in the day Dick Cheney went against long standing protocol again and commandeered Camp David:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After attending President Bush’s meeting with his principal advisers in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center beneath the White House,  Vice President Dick Cheney heads back upstairs, accompanied by his wife  Lynne Cheney and his two top aides, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and David  Addington. They all head out onto the White House’s South Lawn and get  onto Marine Two, the vice president’s helicopter, being joined on it by a  military aide, a communications expert, three Secret Service agents,  and Cheney’s doctor. They take off, in violation of long-standing  protocol, according to which only the president takes off from the South  Lawn. </p>
<p>Only a few of the most senior White House officials are informed  of their destination. About 30 minutes later they arrive at Camp David,  the presidential retreat in the Catoctin Mountains, about 70 miles from  the White House. Again going against tradition, Cheney and his family  settle into the cabin usually reserved for the president, Aspen Lodge.  Liz Cheney, the vice president’s eldest daughter, and her young family,  joins them there. This is the first of many nights that Cheney spends in  “secure, undisclosed locations” in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks  (see <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/item.jsp?item=a091201securelocations">September 12, 2001-2002</a>). [<a href="http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/c3i/campdavid.htm" target="_blank">Federation of American Scientists, 10/2/2000</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060723467/crooksandliar-20/ref=nosim/" target="_blank">Hayes, 2007, pp. 345-346</a>] He will return to Washington the following morning for an 8 a.m. meeting at the White House (see <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/item.jsp?item=a091201tenetbriefing">September 12, 2001</a>).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I wonder how George Bush will feel after Cheney&#8217;s book is released because during an attack on US soil, Vice President Dick Cheney appointed himself the<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/20/opinion/meyer/main1523934.shtml"> Decider in Chief</a> on that crucial day in our history.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/dick-cheney-claims-he-not-bush-was-the-decider/">Dick Cheney Claims He &#8211; Not Bush &#8211; Was The Decider</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/dick-cheney-claims-he-not-bush-was-the-decider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tin-Foil Hat Time: The Richard Clarke Edition</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/tin-foil-hat-time-the-richard-clarke-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/tin-foil-hat-time-the-richard-clarke-edition/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Tenet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Clarke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe in what the great muckraker I.F. Stone said, that all governments have one thing in common: <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/All_governments_lie.html?id=a9NAiJUiSD0C">They lie</a>. I think within the broad contours of what we know about 9/11, there's a lot that we don't know, and a lot of baloney that's&#160;been put out there. Even <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ground-Truth-Untold-America-Attack/dp/1594488940">the chief counsel of the the 9/11 Commission</a> believes there was a cover-up related to the failed air-defense response that morning. There are still <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50745-2004Jun17.html">valid questions </a>about whether it was Cheney or Bush calling the shots in the initial&#160;moments. We don't know everything we should about what our government knew about what Pakistan or Saudi Arabia knew before 9/11. In that context, Richard Clarke's "conspiracy theory" seems highly plausible.</p>
<p>I think that will be one positive aspect to the upcoming 10th anniversary overload -- the passage of time will make it less taboo to talk about some of those issues. Hopefully by the 15th anniversary, we'll have a better understanding of 9/11 than we do today, on the eve of the 10th.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/tin-foil-hat-time-the-richard-clarke-edition/">Tin-Foil Hat Time: The Richard Clarke Edition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/11/september-11th-anniversary-richard-clarke-s-explosive-cia-cover-up-charge.html">Another 9/11 conspiracy nut is outed</a>:</p>
<div class="section parbase text">
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>With the </em><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2011/07/30/bush-to-attend-9-11-ceremony.html" target="_blank"><em>10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the 9/11 attacks</em></a><em> only a month away, former CIA Director George Tenet and two former top aides are fighting back hard against allegations that they engaged in a massive cover-up in 2000 and 2001 to hide intelligence from the White House and the FBI that might have prevented the attacks.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The source of the explosive, unproved allegations is a man who once considered Tenet a close friend: </em><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/we-read-it/2010/04/26/cyber-war-the-next-threat-to-national-security-and-what-to-do-about-it.html" target="_blank"><em>former White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke</em></a><em>, who makes the charges against Tenet and the CIA in an interview for a radio documentary timed to the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary next month. Portions of the Clarke interview were made available to The Daily Beast by the producers of the documentary.</em></p>
</div>
<div class="section parbase text">
<div class="section parbase text">
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>In the interview for the documentary, Clarke offers an incendiary theory that, if true, would rewrite the history of the 9/11 attacks, suggesting that the CIA intentionally withheld information from the White House and FBI in 2000 and 2001 that two Saudi-born terrorists were on U.S. soil—terrorists who went on to become suicide hijackers on 9/11.</em></p>
<p>This story appears on the T-minus-one-month date of the big&nbsp;9/11 anniversary; there will soon be a flood of articles from all angles about the event that was so remarkably horrific that it&#8217;s hard to believe it was 10 fairly long years ago. As I&#8217;ve noted in this space in the past (although not recently), there seems to be only two prevailing views about what happened that day and how it happened: The official, immutable and unquestionable government version &#8212; or beyond the &#8220;Twilight Zone&#8221; totally whacked- out conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>I have always believed in what you could call &#8220;the third way&#8221; &#8212; that the evidence is overwhelming&nbsp;that the basic story line of 9/11 is pretty much what we think it is,&nbsp;that the attacks were planned and carried out by known members of al-Qaeda and masterminded by Osama bin Laden, to boost bin Laden&#8217;s stature in the Muslim world (which lasted just a brief time, thank Allah) and to sow chaos in America (which worked, sadly.) There were no holograms or whatever, and real hijacked jetliners were what crashed into the Pentagon and into that field in Shanksville. George W. Bush did not know of the attacks in advance &#8212; if he did, do you really think he would have had that dazed look on his face when he was told the second plane struck the World Trade Center?</p>
<p>But I also believe in what the great muckraker I.F. Stone said, that all governments have one thing in common: <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/All_governments_lie.html?id=a9NAiJUiSD0C">They lie</a>. I think within the broad contours of what we know about 9/11, there&#8217;s a lot that we don&#8217;t know, and a lot of baloney that&#8217;s&nbsp;been put out there. Even <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ground-Truth-Untold-America-Attack/dp/1594488940">the chief counsel of the the 9/11 Commission</a> believes there was a cover-up related to the failed air-defense response that morning. There are still <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50745-2004Jun17.html">valid questions </a>about whether it was Cheney or Bush calling the shots in the initial&nbsp;moments. We don&#8217;t know everything we should about what our government knew about what Pakistan or Saudi Arabia knew before 9/11. In that context, Richard Clarke&#8217;s &#8220;conspiracy theory&#8221; seems highly plausible.</p>
<p>I think that will be one positive aspect to the upcoming 10th anniversary overload &#8212; the passage of time will make it less taboo to talk about some of those issues. Hopefully by the 15th anniversary, we&#8217;ll have a better understanding of 9/11 than we do today, on the eve of the 10th.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/tin-foil-hat-time-the-richard-clarke-edition/">Tin-Foil Hat Time: The Richard Clarke Edition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/tin-foil-hat-time-the-richard-clarke-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Families Had To Fight&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/the-families-had-to-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/the-families-had-to-fight/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VIDEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=5478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/the-families-had-to-fight/">The Families Had To Fight&#8230;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/the-families-had-to-fight/">The Families Had To Fight&#8230;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/the-families-had-to-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excerpt: Bush In His Own Words on 9/11</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/excerpt-bush-in-his-own-words-on-911/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/excerpt-bush-in-his-own-words-on-911/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=3119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/40075575/ns/today-books/">MSNBC has published excerpts</a> regarding 9/11 from George W. Bush's new memoir:</p>
<p>"The Secret Service wanted to get me to Air Force One, and fast. As the motorcade charged down Florida Route 41, I called Condi from the secure phone in the limo. She told me there had been a third plane crash, this one into the Pentagon. I sat back in my seat and absorbed her words. My thoughts clarified: The first plane could have been an accident. The second was definitely an attack. The third was a declaration of war."</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/excerpt-bush-in-his-own-words-on-911/">Excerpt: Bush In His Own Words on 9/11</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/40075575/ns/today-books/">MSNBC has published excerpts</a> regarding 9/11 from George W. Bush&#8217;s new memoir:</p>
<p><b>9/11</b></p>
<p>The Secret Service wanted to get me to Air Force One, and fast. As the motorcade charged down Florida Route 41, I called Condi from the secure phone in the limo. She told me there had been a third plane crash, this one into the Pentagon. I sat back in my seat and absorbed her words. My thoughts clarified: The first plane could have been an accident. The second was definitely an attack. The third was a declaration of war.</p>
<p>My blood was boiling. We were going to find out who did this, and kick their ass. &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; I stepped into the presidential cabin and asked to be alone. I thought about the fear that must have seized the passengers on those planes and the grief that would grip the families of the dead. So many people had lost their loved ones with no warning. I prayed that God would comfort the suffering and guide the country through this trial. I thought of the lyrics from one of my favorite hymns, “God of Grace and God of Glory”: “Grant us wisdom, grant us courage, for the facing of this hour.”</p>
<p>While my emotions might have been similar to those of most Americans, my duties were not. There would be time later to mourn. There would be an opportunity to seek justice. But first I had to manage the crisis. We had suffered the most devastating surprise attack since Pearl Harbor. An enemy had struck our capital for the first time since the War of 1812. In a single morning, the purpose of my presidency had grown clear: to protect our people and defend our freedom that had come under attack &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; The collapse of the towers magnified the catastrophe. Fifty thousand people worked in the buildings on a typical business day. Some had been evacuated, but I wondered how many were left. Thousands? Tens of thousands? I had no idea. But I was certain that I had just watched more Americans die than any president in history.</p>
<p>I kept up-to-date on the latest developments by calling Dick and Condi in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center). We tried to establish an open line, but it kept dropping. &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; When we did receive information, it was often contradictory and sometimes downright wrong. I was experiencing the fog of war. There were reports of a bomb at the State Department, a fire on the National Mall, a hijacked Korean airliner bound for the United States, and a call-in threat to Air Force One. The caller had used the plane’s code name, Angel, which few people knew. The most bizarre report came when I was informed of a high-speed object flying toward our ranch in Crawford. All of this information later proved to be false. But given the circumstances, we took every report seriously.</p>
<p>One report I received proved true. A fourth plane had gone down somewhere in Pennsylvania. “Did we shoot it down, or did it crash?” I asked Dick Cheney. Nobody knew. I felt sick to my stomach. Had I ordered the death of those innocent Americans?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/excerpt-bush-in-his-own-words-on-911/">Excerpt: Bush In His Own Words on 9/11</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/excerpt-bush-in-his-own-words-on-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chomsky: No Evidence Provided For 9/11 War</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/chomsky-no-evidence-of-al-qaeda-behind-911/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/chomsky-no-evidence-of-al-qaeda-behind-911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 02:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post (540x324)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noam Chomsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=3059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent interview with Iran&#8217;s Press TV, leading American intellectual and political dissident Noam Chomsky stated that the wars launched in response to the 9/11 attacks are &#8220;criminal&#8221; and noted that US government provided no evidence that bin Laden was responsible for the attacks before bombing Afghanistan. Chomsky told Press TV: &#8220;The explicit and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/chomsky-no-evidence-of-al-qaeda-behind-911/">Chomsky: No Evidence Provided For 9/11 War</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent interview with Iran&#8217;s Press TV, leading American intellectual and political dissident Noam Chomsky stated that the wars launched in response to the 9/11 attacks are &#8220;criminal&#8221; and noted that US government provided no evidence that bin Laden was responsible for the attacks before bombing Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Chomsky told <a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail/149520.html">Press TV</a>: &#8220;The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any. We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the years since 9/11, Chomsky has often been at odds with activists seeking accountability for the attacks, which have been used as justification for an ongoing global &#8220;war on terror&#8221; and continuing infringement of civil liberties. Chomsky has at times derided the cause and accused 9/11 activists of distracting from more important issues. In 2008, Chomsky added his name to <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/july10/petition.html">a petition</a> started by 9/11 family members calling for the release of classified documents relating to the 9/11 attacks.</p>
<p>Watch a clip of the Press TV interview with Noam Chomsky, courtesy of oumma.com:</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uzNhAo1zBD4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uzNhAo1zBD4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/chomsky-no-evidence-of-al-qaeda-behind-911/">Chomsky: No Evidence Provided For 9/11 War</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/chomsky-no-evidence-of-al-qaeda-behind-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drudge: Bush Thought Flight 93 Was Shot Down on 9/11</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/drudge-bush-thought-flight-93-was-shot-down-on-911/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/drudge-bush-thought-flight-93-was-shot-down-on-911/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight 93]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=2974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Raw Story reporting on leaked details of George Bush&#8217;s forthcoming book: According to a report at Matt Drudge&#8217;s website, The Drudge Report, the new book Decision Points talks about topics including alcoholism, his order to shoot down planes on 9/11, Katrina and the financial crisis. According to Drudge, the book begins, &#8220;It was a simple [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/drudge-bush-thought-flight-93-was-shot-down-on-911/">Drudge: Bush Thought Flight 93 Was Shot Down on 9/11</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raw Story reporting on leaked details of George Bush&#8217;s forthcoming book:</p>
<blockquote><p>According to a report at Matt Drudge&#8217;s website, The Drudge Report, the new book Decision Points talks about topics including alcoholism, his order to shoot down planes on 9/11, Katrina and the financial crisis.</p>
<p>According to Drudge, the book begins, &#8220;It was a simple question, &#8216;Can you remember the last day you didn&#8217;t have a drink?'&#8221;</p>
<p>The book also discusses the events of Sept. 11, 2001. That morning, Bush says he made the order to shoot down hijacked planes.</p>
<p>At 10:03 a.m. on Sept. 11, 2001, United Flight 93 slammed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Most believe it was brought down when passengers tried to overtake the hijackers.</p>
<p>Bush writes that at first he believed Flight 93 had been shot down by the US military, according to Drudge&#8217;s filing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Jon Gold notes &#8220;this is <a href="http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a1006bushwonders#a1006bushwonders">nothing new</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>As usual, the comments on Raw Story are a hotbed of 9/11 controversy.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/drudge-bush-thought-flight-93-was-shot-down-on-911/">Drudge: Bush Thought Flight 93 Was Shot Down on 9/11</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/drudge-bush-thought-flight-93-was-shot-down-on-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Their &#034;Biggest Adversary&#034;</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/their-biggest-adversary/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/their-biggest-adversary/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VIDEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=2970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/their-biggest-adversary/">Their &quot;Biggest Adversary&quot;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/their-biggest-adversary/">Their &quot;Biggest Adversary&quot;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/their-biggest-adversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olbermann Slams Cheney and Bush for 9/11</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/olbermann-slams-cheney-and-bush-for-911/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/olbermann-slams-cheney-and-bush-for-911/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=2615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Madame, who in the hell do you think you&#8217;re talking to? The negligence, dereliction of duty and nonfeasance committed by your father and his puppet, the previous President, led directly to this country having to absorb a terrorist attack &#8230; Your father and Mr. Bush, Ms. Cheney, were utter failures whose track record on terrorism [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/olbermann-slams-cheney-and-bush-for-911/">Olbermann Slams Cheney and Bush for 9/11</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Madame, who in the hell do you think you&#8217;re talking to? The negligence, dereliction of duty and nonfeasance committed by your father and his puppet, the previous President, led directly to this country having to absorb a terrorist attack &#8230; Your father and Mr. Bush, Ms. Cheney, were utter failures whose track record on terrorism will go down in infamy.&#8221;</p>
<p></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/olbermann-slams-cheney-and-bush-for-911/">Olbermann Slams Cheney and Bush for 9/11</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/olbermann-slams-cheney-and-bush-for-911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Parry Decoupling From Reality</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/robert-parry-decoupling-from-reality-hit-piece-911-truth-news/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/robert-parry-decoupling-from-reality-hit-piece-911-truth-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIT PIECES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post (540x324)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hit piece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Parry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=2392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After watching the success of the Bush administration’s propaganda, some on the Left decided that their only hope was to give the neocons a taste of their own disinformation medicine. Though the 9/11 evidence pointed to Bush’s incompetence in ignoring warnings and failing to stop al-Qaeda’s terrorist operation, some American leftists felt that it wasn’t [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/robert-parry-decoupling-from-reality-hit-piece-911-truth-news/">Robert Parry Decoupling From Reality</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching the success of the Bush administration’s propaganda, some on the Left decided that their only hope was to give the neocons a taste of their own disinformation medicine.</p>
<p>Though the 9/11 evidence pointed to Bush’s incompetence in ignoring warnings and failing to stop al-Qaeda’s terrorist operation, some American leftists felt that it wasn’t enough to convince the people that Bush was simply a bonehead. The feeling was that Bush had so bamboozled the people that they needed to be shocked out of their trances by something bigger.</p>
<p>So, this small group brushed aside the evidence-backed narrative of Bush’s incompetence and even a competing interpretation of that factual framework, claiming that Bush had “let 9/11 happen.” Instead, this group insisted that the only way to wake up America was to make a case that Bush “made it happen,” that he was behind the 9/11 attacks.</p>
<p>To accomplish this feat, these activists, who became known as “9/11 truthers,” threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda’s involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they indeed had done it. The &#8220;truthers&#8221; then cherry-picked a few supposed “anomalies” to build an “inside-job” story line.</p>
<p>The “truthers” even recycled many of the Right’s sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence. These sleight-of-hand techniques obscured the glaring fact that not a single witness has emerged to describe the alleged “inside job,” either the supposed “controlled demolition” of the Twin Towers or the alleged “missile” attack on the Pentagon.</p>
<p>Some supporters of the “inside-job” theory may have simply been destabilized by all the years of right-wing disinformation. Reality and real evidence may have lost all currency, replaced by a deep and understandable distrust of the nation&#8217;s leaders and the news media.</p>
<p>Other &#8220;truthers&#8221; whom I’ve talked with view their anti-Bush propaganda campaign as a success because it injected some doubts among the American people about Bush. One told me that this was the only attack line against Bush that had gained any “traction.”</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/robert-parry-decoupling-from-reality-hit-piece-911-truth-news/">Robert Parry Decoupling From Reality</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/robert-parry-decoupling-from-reality-hit-piece-911-truth-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
