
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journal of 9/11 Studies &#8211; 9/11 Truth News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://911truthnews.com/tag/journal-of-911-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://911truthnews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 02:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why Australia&#039;s Presence in Afghanistan is Untenable</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/why-australias-presence-in-afghanistan-is-untenable/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/why-australias-presence-in-afghanistan-is-untenable/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of 9/11 Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=4656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"The events of 11 September 2001 provided a nominal casus belli for the attack and occupation of Afghanistan, heavily promoted by the mainstream media, which particularly in the United States is closely linked to the major armaments manufacturers. The same mainstream media have uncritically accepted and promoted the US government’s version of events about 11 September 2001, not because that account is plausible, which it manifestly is not, but because to question the rationale for military intervention is to question the whole of post World War II US foreign policy. If US foreign policy is seriously flawed then that in turn must raise serious questions about the level and extent of Australia’s adherence to the policies of its powerful ally."</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/AustraliasUntenable.pdf">"Why Australia's Presence in Afghanistan is Untenable"</a> by James O'Neill - a new paper published at <a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com">The Journal of 9/11 Studies</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/why-australias-presence-in-afghanistan-is-untenable/">Why Australia&#039;s Presence in Afghanistan is Untenable</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/AustraliasUntenable.pdf">&#8220;Why Australia&#8217;s Presence in Afghanistan is Untenable&#8221;</a> by James O&#8217;Neill &#8211; a new paper published at <a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com">The Journal of 9/11 Studies</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The events of 11 September 2001 provided a nominal casus belli for the attack and occupation of Afghanistan, heavily promoted by the mainstream media, which particularly in the United States is closely linked to the major armaments manufacturers. The same mainstream media have uncritically accepted and promoted the US government’s version of events about 11 September 2001, not because that account is plausible, which it manifestly is not, but because to question the rationale for military intervention is to question the whole of post World War II US foreign policy. If US foreign policy is seriously flawed then that in turn must raise serious questions about the level and extent of Australia’s adherence to the policies of its powerful ally.&#8221;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/why-australias-presence-in-afghanistan-is-untenable/">Why Australia&#039;s Presence in Afghanistan is Untenable</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/why-australias-presence-in-afghanistan-is-untenable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Paper at The Journal of 9/11 Studies</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/new-paper-at-the-journal-of-911-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://911truthnews.com/new-paper-at-the-journal-of-911-studies/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of 9/11 Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pilots for 9/11 Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=4345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new paper by Dr. Frank Legge and Warren Stutt has been published at the Journal of 9/11 Studies. This is entitled <b>“Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon.”</b> <a href="http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf">LINK</a><br />
Many interested parties have discussed the issues related to this paper, but few have been willing to approach it with a thoughtful, objective manner and with attention to detail. As we have in the past, my co-editor Steve Jones and I call for a similarly thoughtful, objective and detailed response that addresses all the evidence. If such a response can be made, we would welcome it as a submission to the Journal of 9/11 Studies.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/new-paper-at-the-journal-of-911-studies/">New Paper at The Journal of 9/11 Studies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new paper by Dr. Frank Legge and Warren Stutt has been published at the Journal of 9/11 Studies. This is entitled <b>“Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon.”</b> <a href="http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf">LINK</a></p>
<p>Here is an excerpt:</p>
<p>“There have, however, been other interested parties who looked at the available data and came to different conclusions. Researcher John Farmer concluded that there was indeed a defect in the file and that about 4 to 6 seconds of data was missing from the end. If this is true it would be easy to find a flight path which would permit the plane to descend and pull up safely. Despite this finding the adherents of the contrary theories have remained adamant that the plane flew over the building or could not have survived the final pull-up. They continue to maintain that the official account of the path of the plane, which necessarily includes impact with the Pentagon, is false. A number of analyses have been presented which indicate that there are elements of the official account of the attack on the Pentagon which are false but it is our purpose to show that the FDR data is not one of them.”</p>
<p>Many interested parties have discussed the issues related to this paper, but few have been willing to approach it with a thoughtful, objective manner and with attention to detail. As we have in the past, my co-editor Steve Jones and I call for a similarly thoughtful, objective and detailed response that addresses all the evidence. If such a response can be made, we would welcome it as a submission to the Journal of 9/11 Studies.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com/new-paper-at-the-journal-of-911-studies/">New Paper at The Journal of 9/11 Studies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://911truthnews.com">9/11 Truth News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://911truthnews.com/new-paper-at-the-journal-of-911-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
