
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://911truthnews.com/the-pentagon-attack-what-the-physical-evidence-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://911truthnews.com/the-pentagon-attack-what-the-physical-evidence-shows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonywicher</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/the-pentagon-attack-what-the-physical-evidence-shows/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tonywicher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=4133#comment-266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also believe that the CIT (the Citizen&#039;s Information Team does not supply convincing evidence that no 757 hit the Pentagon and that the 9/11 truth movement should not rely on this idea. Maybe, just maybe CIT is right, but I wouldn&#039;t bet the farm on it. I WOULD bet the farm that the three WTC buildings were explosively demolished. We must strongly distinguish between what is scientifically well established and what is speculative. We must base our call for an investigation on facts of which we can be certain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also believe that the CIT (the Citizen&#8217;s Information Team does not supply convincing evidence that no 757 hit the Pentagon and that the 9/11 truth movement should not rely on this idea. Maybe, just maybe CIT is right, but I wouldn&#8217;t bet the farm on it. I WOULD bet the farm that the three WTC buildings were explosively demolished. We must strongly distinguish between what is scientifically well established and what is speculative. We must base our call for an investigation on facts of which we can be certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://911truthnews.com/the-pentagon-attack-what-the-physical-evidence-shows/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://911truthnews.com/?p=4133#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this whole piece on here.  It&#039;s probably Jim&#039;s most thorough piece on the Pentagon attack.  Because of all the attacks on witnesses, claims they were all fake or confused, by people such as Griffin, he wanted to do a piece totally on the physical evidence.  He asked for Griffin&#039;s opinion on it, but my understanding is that he never responded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this whole piece on here.  It&#8217;s probably Jim&#8217;s most thorough piece on the Pentagon attack.  Because of all the attacks on witnesses, claims they were all fake or confused, by people such as Griffin, he wanted to do a piece totally on the physical evidence.  He asked for Griffin&#8217;s opinion on it, but my understanding is that he never responded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
