“I did not start a campaign against Wikipedia”

I have to admit that I know some who have done it a few times. When the nanothermite paper came out, the biased Admins chose to completely censor not only the content, but anyone who tried to post it, and so perhaps as many as a dozen long-time users were simply swept off the site as punishment, banned for posting the paper at all. They seemed to have gone ballistic. They would not even allow mention of the paper on the page titled “9/11 Truth Movement,” claiming that it wasn’t “notable” enough! They removed it from the page of an author of the paper. It was a transparent level of censorship that had nothing to do with notability.

When *that* level of nonsense is going on uncritically with a site which CLAIMS to be a free encyclopedia for everyone to use, it’s gotten to the point where action needed to be taken beyond just ignoring it and posting elsewhere.

And so someone posted, “Wikipedia editors livid over new paper“, here on TruthAction, and it garnered a lot of traffic and discussion. When they saw that we’d posted their comments, they changed the format of the discussion page to hide the comments. They even created special “discretionary sanctions” to deal with postings by anyone about 9/11.