As a result of John Faine’s recent interaction with Kevin Bracken, considerable discussion has arisen regarding the events of 9/11. Bracken suggested that the official explanation of 9/11 “did not stand up to scientific scrutiny” and challenged Faine to a debate.

Faine’s response was to say that “there is nothing to debate”, and to deliver some uncalled for abuse.

I have been watching the ABC for a long time and have concluded that the ABC must agree that there is nothing to debate as, to my knowledge, it has never permitted a debate to be broadcast. My question is “What are you afraid of”? Surely, if there is no doubt about the official story, any debate would be a hands-down win for the status quo.

As one of the authors of the peer reviewed scientific paper “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe [The Open Chemical Physics Journal], I offer to debate, or if you prefer, submit to interrogation, on the scientific evidence.

Under your charter you are obliged to provide coverage to both sides of all significant debates. I put it to you that, given the extraordinary political decisions which flowed from 9/11, you have a special obligation to give this particular topic fair treatment.

I await your considered response.

Frank Legge

The post ABC Complaint from Dr. Frank Legge appeared first on 9/11 Truth News.