ABC Complaint from Dr. Frank Legge
ABC Recipient: ABC Strategy & Communications
Subject: 9/11 debate
As a result of John Faine’s recent interaction with Kevin Bracken, considerable discussion has arisen regarding the events of 9/11. Bracken suggested that the official explanation of 9/11 “did not stand up to scientific scrutiny” and challenged Faine to a debate.
Faine’s response was to say that “there is nothing to debate”, and to deliver some uncalled for abuse.
I have been watching the ABC for a long time and have concluded that the ABC must agree that there is nothing to debate as, to my knowledge, it has never permitted a debate to be broadcast. My question is “What are you afraid of”? Surely, if there is no doubt about the official story, any debate would be a hands-down win for the status quo.
As one of the authors of the peer reviewed scientific paper “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe [The Open Chemical Physics Journal], I offer to debate, or if you prefer, submit to interrogation, on the scientific evidence.
Under your charter you are obliged to provide coverage to both sides of all significant debates. I put it to you that, given the extraordinary political decisions which flowed from 9/11, you have a special obligation to give this particular topic fair treatment.
I await your considered response.
Frank Legge
Recent Stories
Recent Comments
- Gawker: Chief of CIA’s Global Jihad Unit Revealed Online
- "9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip" - A Participant's Perspective
- Identity of CIA Officer Behind 9/11 & Torture Cases Revealed
- "9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip" - A Participant's Perspective
- "9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip" - A Participant's Perspective
- Who Funded 9/11? Families & Insurers Still Want Answers
- Sibel Edmonds Interviews Paul Thompson