Why the Planes Were Not Intercepted on 9/11
Despite being given plenty of notice about the four planes hijacked on 9/11, FAA management did not request military assistance to ensure the planes were intercepted before they crashed. The 9/11 Commission attributes this to a string of gross failures in communication between the FAA and the military on 9/11. However, the report places no blame on any of the people who were involved and doesn’t even mention the one person who was most important to this chain of communications.
The Many False Hijackings of 9/11
Up to 29 planes were reported as being hijacked on 9/11. Who or what caused these false alarms? What effect did they have on the ability of the military and other US government agencies to respond to the actual attacks and to then assess how those attacks had been able to succeed? These questions have not yet been adequately addressed and need to be investigated thoroughly.
US Reveals Evidence Against Alleged 9/11 Plotters
US prosecutors compiled lots of evidence against the five men accused of having organized the September 11 attacks on the United States, but not until this week have details been fully revealed. The indictment charging self-professed mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others was unsealed when US Attorney General Eric Holder referred the case to […]
The 9/11 Omission Hearings
On September 9th, 2004, then former Rep. Cynthia McKinney, along with 9/11 Family Members and citizen researchers, held what were called the “9/11 Omission Hearings” in New York City. To many of us that have been involved with this cause for a long time, these were truly historic. It is important to note that these hearings took place not two months after the release of the 9/11 Report. If you’ve never seen them, they come highly recommended. As you watch them, ask yourself, “is this something the media should have told me about?”
Critique of David Ray Griffin's Fake Calls Theory
Beginning with his book New Pearl Harbor (2004) David Ray Griffin raised questions concerning the veracity of reports of phone calls from the 9/11 hijacked airliners, specifically, Ted Olson’s account. Since at least 2006, he has promoted a theory that the 9/11 plane passenger phone calls were faked, and has speculated this was done with […]
The FBI “Kamikaze Pilots” Case
In February 2004 Behrooz Sarshar provided the 9/11 Commission’s investigators with specific documents and names of the related witnesses, including the full name and contact information of the key “FBI Asset/Informant” in an FBI case titled ‘Kamikaze Pilots.’ However, the commission chose not to contact or interview any of these witnesses, including FBI Director Robert Mueller. The Commission’s final report did not mention a single word of this documented testimony, and their recently released memorandum omitted the entire interview with no explanation provided.
An Interview with Physicist David Chandler
Visibility 9/11 presents an interview with physicist David Chandler who has just released his 9/11 Analysis dvd. Chandler talks with host John Bursill about his part in getting the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to admit that WTC 7 fell at a an acceleration consistent with freefall, about the need for 9/11 truth and justice and the importance of not becoming the “what hit the Pentagon” movement. Download mp3
The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows
The attack on the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001 presents the public with a number of unanswered questions which have motivated many to demand further investigation into the events of that day. Unfortunately, the issue is surrounded by a great deal of speculation and disinformation. The following article, published in 2006, presents available evidence clearly indicating that the most likely scenario was simply that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. How that happened remains an open question.
The Complete Censorship of Sibel Edmonds
Last week John Young’s information site cryptome.org began publishing documents related to the interviews conducted by the 9/11 Commission which were released for the first time. On January 3, Cryptome posted the 9/11 Commission’s report on my interview (the infamous Sibel Edmonds Case), and aptly titled this particular file as “Sibel Edmonds Censored Yet Again.” Once you read the PDF document you’ll quickly see the reason for Cryptome’s appropriate label.
The Red Flags of September 11th
Visibility 9-11 has launched a new educational series highlighting some of the most glaring contradictions regarding the official account of the 9/11 attacks in an easy-to-digest format. Appropriately titled The Red Flags of September 11th 2001, the first entries in this series can be viewed here.