TOPICS

"debunkers" #gifiles #occupywallstreet 7/7 bombings 9/11 9/11 attacks 9/11 Citizens Commission 9/11 Commission 9/11 Commission Report 9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip 9/11 Fahrenheit 911 9/11 families 9/11 phone calls 9/11 survivor 9/11 truth 9/11 Truther 9/11 Truth Movement 9/11 victims 9/11 War 9/11 War Games 9/11 Wars 9/11 Whistleblowers 9/11 workers 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington 9/11: Press For Truth 10th Anniversary 757 911 first responders 911 museum 911blogger 911truthnews.com 2012 Abbottabad Able Danger accountability ACLU activism activists Adam Curtis Adam Syed AE911truth ae911truth.org Afghanistan aftermath Ahmadinejad AIPAC Air Force One al-Awlaki al-Qaida Alan Colmes Alan Grayson Alec Baldwin Alec Station Alex Jones Alfreda Frances Bikowsky Alhazmi Ali Soufan Al Jazeera Almihdhar al Qaeda Amalgam Virgo American War Machine Among the Truthers Andrew Card Andrew Napolitano Andrews Air Force Base anniversary Ann Wright Anonymous Anthony Shaffer Anthony Summers Anthrax Antonio Martinez Anwar al-Alwlaki Anwar al-Awlaki Anwar Awlaki architects Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth artifacts assassination Atiyah abd al-Rahman Australia Australian Broadcasting Corporation b BAE Ban Ki-moon Barack Obama Barcelona Barnes and Noble Barrie Zwicker baseball cards BBC BCCI Behrooz Sarshar Benedict Sliney Ben Fordham Ben Sliney Bill Clinton Bill Doyle Bill Maher Bill Moyers Bill O'Reilly bin Laden Blackwater Bloomington Bob Bowman Bob Graham Bob Kerrey Bob McIlvaine Bosnia Brett Smith Brian Kilmeade Brooklyn Bridge Bruce Ivins Building 7 Building What bureaucracy Bush Bush Administration C-SPAN Camp David cancer capitalism Cass Sunstein censorship Champion Cheney China Chip Berlet Chris Hedges Chris Mohr Christian Chuck Schumer CIA Cindy Sheehan CIT Citizen Investigation Team Civil Disobedience civil liberties Classified Woman classroom CNN Cofer Black COG Cointelpro Cold War Cole Bombing Coleen Rowley Colin Powell Colorado Colorado Public Television Condonleezza Rice Con Edison congress conspiracies conspiracy conspiracy theory Constitution consumerism contradictions Cordoba Initiative corporate media Cosmos Counter-Terror Expo Counterpunch counterterrorism coverup cover up CPT12 cryptome.org cybersecurity Cynthia McKinney Dahlia Wasfi Daniel Ellsberg Daniel Pipes Daniel Sunjata Dave Frasca David Chandler David Long David Ray Griffin David Swanson David Weigel DC debris debunking Deep Politics Democracy Now Democratic Party demolition Demos Dennis Kucinich detainee detainees Detroit DIA Dick Cheney Dick Gregory Disconnecting the Dots disinformation documents Donald Rumsfeld donations Donna Marsh O'Connor Downing Street drones dust Dwight D. Eisenhower DynCorp Egypt Egyptian Revolution Eleanor Hill Elena Kagan Eleventh actions Emanuel Sferios Emily Louise Church empire engineers entrapment Eric Bolling Eric Holder Eric Margolis espionage act Evan Dando evidence exercises explosions extremism F-16 FAA facebook Fahrenheit 9/11 Fake Phone Calls theory FBI FDR Analysis Fealgood Foundation FEMA firefighters first responders Flight 77 flight 93 Florida FOIA foreknowledge FOX FOX News Frances Bikowsky Frank Legge Fran Townsend fraud Fred Burton fresh kills funding FX Gareth Newnham Gawker General Assemby George Bush George Tenet George W. Bush Geraldo Rivera Germany Geronimo Gladio Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald globalization Global Jihad Unit Graeme MacQueen Green Party Gregg Roberts Ground Zero Ground Zero mosque groups Guantanamo Guantanamo Bay Gulf of Tonkin hackers Hamid Karzai Haqqani health Health Bill hearing Heather Penney Heroin hijackers hijacking Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton History Commons historycommons.org hit piece Homeland Security Howie Hawkins HR 847 Huffington Post Hypothesis Image Comics immunity Indefinite Detention India infiltration Inspire magazine Intelligence Advisory Board intercept International Center for 9/11 Studies investigation Iowa Iran Iran-Contra Iraq Iraq War ISI Islam Israel issues James Bamford James Gourley Jane Mayer Janet Napolitano Janette MacKinlay Jason Leopold Jay Carney Jeffery Farrar Jellyfish Jersey Girls Jesse Ventura JICI Jim Corr Jim Fetzer Joe Biden Joe Rogan John Albanese John Ashcroft John Bursill John Duffy John Feal John Gross John Judge John Lennon John Pilger John Stewart John Walker Lindh Joint Congressional Inquiry Joint Forces Intelligence Command Jonathan Barnett Jonathan Cole Jonathan Kay Jon Cole Jon Faine Jon Gold Jon Stewart Joseph Doyle journalism Journal of 9/11 Studies Joy Behar Judge Hellerstein Judy Wood Julia Gillard Julian Assange justice Justice Department KALW Katherine Bigelow kdub Keith Olbermann Kent Gibson Kevin Barrett Kevin Bracken Kevin Fenton Kevin Ryan Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Korey Rowe Kosovo Kristen Breitweiser KSM LaborTech Langley Larry Silverstein Laurie Manwell Lawrence Wilkerson lawsuit Lee Hamilton Leon Panetta Libya lies limited hangout Link TV Liz Cheney Lloyd's of London London Truth Action Loose Change Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup Lorie Van Auken Lupe Fiasco Mahmoud Ahmed mainstream mainstream media Manny Badillo Mark Basile Mark Bavis Mark Rossini Mark Ruffalo Matt Taibbi Media Matters Media Roots MEK Mexican drug cartel Michael Anne Casey Michael Canavan Michael Goodwin Michael Moore Michael Mukasey Michael Mullen Michael Ruppert Michael Scheuer Mickey Huff Mike Gravel Mike Huckabee milestone Military Tribunals Mindy Kleinberg Mohamed Osman Mohamud Mohammad Atta Mohammed Junaid Babar Morocco Mosque Mother Jones msnbc Muburak Muhammad Hussain Mumbai attacks Murdoch Muslim Muslim Center My Pet Goat Nafeez Ahmed nano-thermite Naomi Klein Naomi Wolf National Institute of Standards and Technology National September 11 Memorial NATO NBC NDAA Netanyahu Newburgh 4 news News Corp New York New York City New York magazine New York TImes New Zealand NFL Niels Harrit NIST Noam Chomsky NORAD NORAD. FAA Norman Mineta Norway NSA NYC NYCCAN NYPD Obama Occupy Wall Street official account Official Government Version Oliver North Olympia Snowe Operation Dark Heart Operation Northwoods Opium Osama Bin Laden Oslo Ottawa OWS P2 Pakistan Palestine Panetta Pat Curley Patriot Act Patriot Defense Group Patty Casazza Paul Thompson Peace of the Action Pentagon Pentagon Papers PENTTBOM Peter Dale Scott Peter King Peter Phillips petition Philadelphia Philip Giraldi Philip Zelikow phone hacking photographs photos physical evidence Pilots for 9/11 Truth Pinochet Pipeline Pittsburgh Steelers plane crash PNAC podcast Political Prisoners political research associates Port Authority Preet Bharara press press release Press TV Prince Bandar Project Censored propaganda pseudo-journalism psychology Pumpitout Radio Qatar Quantico questions R. Leslie Deak rachel maddow radar Radio 2GB Ramzi bin al-Shibh Rap News Rashard Mendenhall Ray Kelly Ray McGovern Raymond Davis Ray Nowosielski Rediscover911 remains Remember Building 7 Rescue Me Research Rethinking Counterterrorism RIBA Richard Blee Richard Clarke Richard Falk Richard Gage Richard Mellon Scaife foundation Richard Meyers Rich Blee Rick Veitch Rita Katz Robert Fisk Robert Foster Robert Parry Robert Scheer Rock Creek Free Press Rolling Stone Rory Albanese Roseanne Barr Rosie O'Donnell Rudy Giuliani Russ Baker Russia Today Saddam Hussein Saeed Sheikh Samir Khan Sarasota Saudi Saudi Arabia Saudis SCAD scads Scott Ford Scott Noble Screw Loose Change Sean Penn secrecykills.com self-deception Senate Senator Mike Gravel Sept. 11 September 11th September 11th Advocates September 11th attacks settlement Shadow Government Shanksville Shoestring shoot down Sibel Edmonds Sibel Emonds simulations SITE sounds South Park Spain speculation speech SPLC spying State crimes against democracy State Department State Of Emergency Stephen Cozen Steve Dusterwald Steven Hatfill Steven Jones Strategy of Tension Stratfor Supreme Court surveillance surveillance state Susan Rice Syed Shazad Taliban taped terrorism terror plot Terror Timeline The Big Lie The Corrs The Daily Show The Eleventh Day of Every Month The Facts Speak For Themselves The Hard Evidence Tour The Huffington Post The Jersey Girls The New Yorker The Pentagon The Post-9/11 World The Power of Nightmares Thermate The Third Stage Thierry Meyssan think tank Thomas Kean Tom Drake Tom Owen Tom Ridge Tom Wilshire Tony Shaffer Tony Szamboti Topps Top Secret America torture Toward Justice Toxic to Democracy Truth Truth Action truthaction.org Truth Action Ottawa Truth Be Told Comics truther Truth Movement truthout.org Truth Revolution Truth Rising TSA twin towers twitter U.S. UN underwear bomber United 93 United 175 United Airlines United Nations University of Colorado University of Virginia UN Watch US government US Military vaccines Valerie Plame Vanessa Lang Langer victims videos videotaped visa express visibility Visibility 9-11 Wall Street war war crimes war games warnings War on Terror Washington Post We Are Change Welt der Wunder Whistleblower whistleblowers White House Who Is Rich Blee Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks William Blum Willie Nelson Will McCants wiretaps World Series World Trade Center WTC WTC 7 WTC7 Xe Yemen Zacarias Moussaoui Zadroga Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act Zelikow

“9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip” – A Participant’s Perspective

911_conspiracy_roadtrip-1
September 8, 2011
Category: COMMENTARY

Hello, my name is Emily Church and I am a mute.

Well, according to the masters of propaganda at the BBC/Renegade Productions.

This summer I participated in a BBC hit piece on 9/11, entitled “Conspiracy Roadtrip”. The premise is simple: five non-believers of the official story journey across the east coast of the USA in search of the truth. On the way we meet “experts” and victims of the attacks, guided by “comedian” Andrew Maxwell who believes the 9/11 commission report was the be all and end all of the 9/11 story.

The show aired a few hours ago and I felt compelled to write my version of what happened on that 8 day roadtrip, to give you the perspective you were not shown by BBC 3.

Firstly, I must tip my hat to them. They did a wonderful editing job. Anyone who has ever had a conversation with me or knows me personally will be very much aware of my opinions re: 9/11, and how outspoken I am about them. However, on this show I appear to be pretty much silent the entire way through.

I wasn’t.

Throughout my time on the show I asked question after question. I asked every single person we met whether they believed the official story to be true and the vast majority of them said no. Ask yourselves this question: why has the footage of us meeting Tom Owen, a voice analyst who worked on the Osama Bin Laden “confession” tapes, been cut completely? There is a simple answer. Because he told us not to believe the official report. Why? Because we aren’t in the “need-to-know” category, his words, not mine. Throughout our entire meeting with Tom Owen it was pretty much clear that the director of the show wasn’t happy with his take. Like most of our meetings with “experts” she would try and steer the conversation in a direction that would better fit her hit piece.

I’d also like to ask why footage of [FAA National Operations Manager] Ben Sliney saying that someone needs to be held accountable for 9/11 was cut? Surely that’s something that the TV license paying public should be able to see? But no, it didn’t fit their requirements for the perfect hit piece.

On the journey I was one of the most vocal contributors, consistently asking questions and receiving no answers whatsoever. I wonder why? Is it completely out of this world to assume that the answers to my questions might have made the truth about 9/11 a little too clear to the viewer? Is it a ridiculous conspiracy theory to assume that the reason the BBC turned me into a mute was to create a biased hit-piece? As with most 9/11 “conspiracy” documentaries, they focused on mostly debunkable theories such as no plane hit the Pentagon and fake phone calls. In other words, shit that pushes us further away from real truth and accountability. They also did a great job at making it seem like I believed most of these theories. I’ll freely admit that before I went on the show I was a “9/11 was an inside job” sort of girl. Hell, I even have a t-shirt from infowars.com. Yes that’s right, I knowingly gave money to Alex Jones.

Before I went on the show I had an epiphany of sorts. I realized that all evidence points to a plane hitting a Pentagon, that maybe the twin towers and Building 7 weren’t a controlled demolition and maybe Dick Cheney and co hadn’t plotted the whole thing with fake hijackers. Now I don’t know what is true and what isn’t. I am not 100% convinced about controlled demolition but it is a distinct possibility. I just decided to focus on the other, less spoken about side of 9/11. The fact that with multiple warnings, the US failed to prevent an attack on their own shores. The fact that so many people have been gagged from talking about 9/11 and revealing information they might know. The fact that the 9/11 commission report, by it’s own ADMISSION was set up to fail. These are just a few of the facts that I brought up on the show. Were they shown? No.

I made it very clear, before I went to the US, that I thought these theories can sometimes be harmful to our chances of ever getting a new investigation into 9/11. I asked repeatedly to speak to some sort of government representative, someone who I could ask my questions to. And despite being told I would get to speak to someone, alas that time never came.

So tonight I watched the show and saw no effort on the BBC’s part to differentiate myself from these theories. In fact, they made it look like these theories were actually my own. As you will see if you watch the show, they told me to ask about airport security, yet they cut out clips of me asking why the hijackers weren’t prevented from entering the country. I asked why, with all of the foreknowledge that the US had, were precautions not taken to protect the innocent American people that tragically lost their lives. I didn’t get an answer.

In ten years, not one person has been held accountable for the events of 9/11, when it is now so evident that the attacks could have been prevented. Hell, even Ben Sliney said that the attacks could’ve been prevented. Why are we so comfortable with letting people get away with this? And why, after ten years, are people that dare to question the official story still painted as conspiracy theorists? Hasn’t it been proven, time and time again, that elements of the US administration covered up their criminal involvement in 9/11?

Interestingly, the whole show seemed to be centered around Charlotte, trying to portray her as something she isn’t. The editing was truly phenomenal. Here we have a typical conspiracy theorist, unwilling to listen to anyone else’s point of view and adamant that she is right. That’s not how it was. They also included an argument that Charlotte and I had and took it completely out of context. They failed to include the fact that we made up shortly afterwards, with me apologizing to her. It made me quite angry to see vicious comments about her, considering the fact that she is a friend of mine and one of the people I have stayed in most contact with after the show. Yes, I may disagree with her on some points, but that is the great thing about being able to formulate our own opinions. Charlotte and I are united on the fact that 9/11 desperately needs a new investigation. Please don’t fall for the BBC’s clever editing trick, she is not a bad person and the show misrepresented her entirely.

The same goes for Rodney, the other person I have stayed in contact with since being in the US. Again, we may not agree on everything and we have our differences, but in my experience with him he is a rational and down to earth person. Maybe we should all remember that this was a well-crafted hit piece and the editing was designed to generate ill-feeling towards Rodney and Charlotte, the most head-strong people on the show (along with myself, obviously).

And here we reach Andrew Maxwell, the Irish comedian who consistently ridiculed us and walked away in the middle of debates. See, the BBC don’t want you to know that he complained throughout the entire shoot, laughed about us behind our backs and on more than one occasion said that he wished he’d never signed on to do the show. He’s not a bad person. He was there trying to make some money, we were there trying to get some truth. It’s as simple as that.

Personally, I’m disgusted at the documentary and I think participating in the show will always be one of my biggest regrets. But at the same time, I feel pretty lucky that I got to meet the people I did and ask the questions that I did, even though they weren’t included in the show. It saddens me that I look like a dumb student who doesn’t know a thing about 9/11 and it angers me that I barely have a voice in the entire 60 minutes that the show runs for.

Overall the experience was an interesting one, but one I wouldn’t do again. Imagine intense heat, stuck on a bus all day with cameras shoved in your face, 12 hour filming days, early mornings and emotional breakdowns. It was intense to say the least.

There are a lot more grievances I have with the show but that’s something I will write about another day. Now, it’s time to get some sleep and try to find hope in the fact that I know what happened on the 9/11 Conspiracy Road Trip, I know what I said and I know the answers I got.

  1. jelleepie says:

    What a disgusting sham that show was! I thought my Fiance was gonna smash the TV with a sledgehammer. It was pretty obvious it was heavily edited, total BS from Auntie Beeb. Charlie Feitch was a total let down too, how could someone with his knowledge be so freaking duped by lego bricks. But we are not alone, no matter how they try to make us look our numbers are growing and pushing weak ass crap that doesn’t explain anything just proves how they have resorted to clutching at straws.

    • mediasavvy says:

      I work in media/ production and I know the power of the edit all to well. I also have been very interested in 911 over the last 10 years and have accumulated most of the theories and ‘facts’ both for and against. I do not confess to know the truth and am pretty much 50/50 on it all.

      Whilst watching this I did get a very uneasy feeling and started to feel angry. As I have said I have always stated I am 50/50 on it all so therefore I have never had a vested interest in not being right or looking silly.

      SO many ‘theories’/ ‘facts’ were left out of this and it seemed a complete hit piece aimed at a very particular demographic.

      For those that saw it I will list a few of the things not raised (or not shown in the edit):

      Nano/ super Thermite is very different from Thermite.
      The security firm removed all sniffer dogs from the building a week before.
      There WERE reports of strange work going on late in the night and at weekends in WTC leading up to Sept 11.
      Al Qaeda was pretty much set up, radicalized and funded by the CIA and the international Elitists/ banking families seem (from what I can tell and from simply applying Occams razor) to have an overall control of the CIA (and the BBC!).

      Concentrating on 911 alone when trying to understand why such a thing would be orchestrated by ‘them’ is shortsighted and will lead you round in circles. Try and step further away and see the much bigger picture – over a longer timeline.

      I genuinely hope that the part of me that believes there are no conspiracies amongst those who might have formed a secret ‘club(s)’. What I do always say though is that if an Alien came to our planet and observed human nature and was then told that over the 2000 + years of civilization no such hidden ‘club(s)’ had formed I think they would say “that honestly has never occurred to anyone!?”

  2. Chrismp says:

    I’m not a believer of the ’911 truth’ story, and personally I find it to be -generally- ridiculous.

    I do think it’s important things like this are questioned though, and I’d never attempt to change someone’s mind on what their beliefs are. I think the ‘truthers’ and the people that think the official story is more likely, can both agree that people believe what they want to in the end, you can put whatever ‘evidence’ you want in front of someone but if they have firm beliefs on what they think happened, it won’t do any good.

    I’m not an expert so I do defer to people who I believe know what they’re talking about.

    The buildings falling did look similar to a controlled demolition.
    It does seem like amateur pilots wouldn’t be able to hit a target like the WTC at such speed.
    It does seem like everything went a bit too smoothly.
    + the 100′s of other things people have thought up.

    I enjoyed the program. It doesn’t surprise me that it was heavily edited and I’m sorry to hear it wasn’t an accurate portrayal of your trip.

    I find the hardcore 911 conspiracy people very interesting…these people are often into many more conspiracy theories like NWO, poison water supply with fluoride etc. There’s also lots of rational, logical people who take up question with the official story and as I said above I think it’s a good thing.

    • kawabill says:

      “I find the hardcore 911 conspiracy people very interesting… these people are often into many more conspiracy theories like NWO, poison water supply with fluoride etc. ”

      Me too, specially the ones that came up with the conspiracy theory where 19 bearded hijackers have managed to kidnap 4 planes, complete with crew and passengers. They scheduled with military accuracy 4 attacks from the caves of Afghanistan, it turns out that 2 planes hit towers that fall straight down, as if nothing was supporting them anymore. Then one plane crashed, because the brave passengers were rebelling against the terrorists. A 3rd tower fell straight down, we don’t know why. Then also a plane hit the pentagon.

      Stupid folk that believe conspiracies…..

    • scrunger says:

      @Chrismp ” I’m not a believer of the ’911 truth’ story, and personally I find it to be -generally- ridiculous.” ……….. “Just a guess – and I’m NO expert!”

      You do not have to be an expert……. for heavens sake. Just a little common sense!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

    • beijingyank says:

      Chris,
      Your comments are minutia.
      It can never take away from the facts that are completely over the top.
      Molten metal, including molybdenum found in the 911 dust.
      Advanced military grade nano thermate found in the 911 dust.
      High levels of tritium recorded.
      Free fall of Building 7.
      The “official line” of “the air is safe to breath and the water is safe to drink” was a blatant lie. You want to believe the rest of their “fairy tale?”
      The criminal demeanor of this government is so arrogantly in your face, it is indicative of a nation conquered and under occupation by a group of baby killing, psychopath, war criminals.
      Get a clue. The biggest crime of the new century, and there has not been one criminal investigation?
      It’s takes NIST 8 years to come up with fairy tale bs.
      Wake up! Do you really want to bury your head in the sand and wait for more surprises from these traitors?

  3. Chrismp says:

    “with all of the foreknowledge that the US had, were precautions not taken to protect the innocent American people that tragically lost their lives. I didn’t get an answer.”

    Just a guess – and I’m NO expert!

    Maybe because they receive a torrential flood of intelligence every single day. It would be interesting to know how often they receive intel that had turned out to be false…I’d guess many thousands of times. Also the fact that nothing like this had happened since the Pearl Harbour, would have possibly left a certain arrogance that this couldn’t happen.

    Just realized this blog is moderated…it’ll be interesting to see whether my posts are allowed or not, seeing as I have a different opinion than many of you.

  4. I applaud you for going on the hit piece any way and it was a good experience to see how lies are perpetuated by scumbags working for major propaganda platforms. In future do the Alex Jones method and tell them you’re not interested in being part of a hit piece. He who controls the editing controls the story and anything you say can and will be used against you int he court of public opinion.
    Let’s have the truth shall we? No mention of Charlie Veitch in this article I presume it’s because you don’t want to get involved in the nastiness of it. Good on you!
    I’ve called him out and gotten abusive swearing emails from him when I was acting like any mate would when they see their friends in the wrong. I don’t believe 9/11 was an inside job, but I don’t believe it’s not either!
    Why Charlie became so abusive to truthers after this road trip I do not know.
    I’ve made 2 videos discussing this if you care to see,

    Charlie Veitch attacks conspiracy theorists, Why? MR NEWS
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNNj7Ec9TIw

    Charlie Veitch, why is he acting like an a**hole? MR NEWS
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAdAyn4gNuo

    We observed a moment of silence for the families and first responders at our 9/11 truth action to remember their courage and remember their loved ones who live on with a heart heavy from crimes covered up by the very people supposed to protect them!

    Thanks all, and I hope we get to the truth of this before it becomes resigned as official history forever.

    Vinny “MR NEWS” Eastwood

  5. ken says:

    “Andrew Maxwell who believes the 9/11 commission report was the be all and end all of the 9/11 story.”

    And people like that call me a conspiracy theorist? I have no idea who is actually behind all the planning and execution of those terrible attacks on September 11th 2001. What I do know is neither do most other people including the members of the 9/11 commission. How do I know? Well it is NOT due to a conspiracy theory. I know because the authors of that report, the commission members, including, but not limited to, the co chairs and the chief legal council to the commission have all come out and distanced themselves from that report because “it is not the truth!”

    That is their words, not mine.

    SO, I am not telling anyone what really happened that day because I do not know. Thing is, nobody knows because the official report is not the truth, and is therefore just another conspiracy theory.

    In fact every theory that exists in the public domain about 9/11 is a conspiracy theory. Some contain more truth than others, but there is no definitive absolute proof of what happened that day, how and why, and it is a travesty that there isn’t.

  6. deasun says:

    I am glad you did the show for me wasn’t all bad. I am sure many people watching the show like myself and thought later, let me check out this stuff , once it ended.
    After the show I felt that I understood events more. Or so it seemed. It almost became “a case proven” from it Yet some weeks later am here because no longer a case proven.
    After reading and looking at others take on the events, the events remain still unclear, the evidence offered doesn’t work out all the time when I checked it online.
    The pancaking of the towers on the viewing of your show, made sense, and the stuff to do with the fire. made sense, however when you look at evidence found else were, it fails to stand up. I was left not getting it again, becuase buildings don’t come down like that without some sort of assistance.

    I have one question and its not covered any place. Not what happened, that to me is a circle, people go on and on about it, as i think in order to answer that,you need to look for the persons firing the guns. One should understand that a gun will not kill anyone but a person holding it will. If 9/11 is indeed a giant smoking gun, then in other words, we need to look behind it, to find the audit trail of people, and money and equipment that allowed it to operate.

    That for me is the route for investigation and the rest will fall into place, if its prove these persons exist. For example to plant the explosives, if used in the twin towers, takes time and trouble. Therfore you need to do a audit trail on people and equipment. You cant ignore this to prove the case. They would of course be paid and of course have families. So one would imagine they sleep well at night? This to me is the leaking boat theory. You cant keep these events quite.After ten year’s someone will speak out if not then they do not exist. As People lose jobs, drink to much, take drugs its a fact, if they exist they would number many, some of them would by now have said something, this line of enquiry must make sense.

    I think we need blogs and websites suggesting people who did this, more the who and where, and money required, you ant going to do stuff like this for less than a few hundred million, and a few thousand persons. Am the same with any case related to a conspiracy. I want the people named together with the evidence, its important but for me I want the people exposed as no event without people can happen.

You must be logged in to post a comment.