9/11 Myths: "A growing Muslim menace"
Let’s be kind. Let’s say it was a coincidence that, at about the same time the Iranian madman was at the UN spewing his nonsense that 9/11 was an “inside job,” the Pakistani terror mom was in a downtown courtroom claiming Israelis destroyed the Twin Towers.
Now let’s be honest. The only coincidence was the timing. The similar content of the two claims illustrates a growing menace in the Muslim world.
The myth-making about 9/11 is spreading, and so is the danger. Nine years after the mass murder by Islamic terrorists, conspiracy theories are deflecting Muslim guilt and inflaming a new generation of jihadists, many of them living in the West.
It is comforting for Americans to dismiss the “truthers” as crackpots since they are the same kind of people who celebrated as the towers and the Pentagon were burning. But the increasing boldness of the wild claims is an alarming indication of how widely accepted they are among mainstream Mideast audiences. We ignore this new phenomenon at our peril.
While Westerners who buy the claims tend to mutter to themselves on the subway and swear the CIA scrambles their television, the scary stuff coming from the Muslim world cannot go unchallenged.
“Some segments within the US government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and to save the Zionist regime,” Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in his Thursday UN speech.
The same day, about three miles south, a veiled Aafia Siddiqui, sentenced to 86 years for trying to kill Americans in Afghanistan and who also plotted New York attacks, charged Israel was connected to 9/11. “I’m not anti-Israel, but, yes, I have said they masterminded 9/11 and I have proof of that,” said the MIT-educated Pakistani.
Whatever their mental state, their message must be taken seriously. To many Muslims, the belief that Islamists are being blamed for an atrocity carried out by Americans or Israelis fits into a larger theory that the West is oppressing Islam.
As I have written, firm opposition by New Yorkers to the Ground Zero mosque is another piece of “evidence” to believers. In short, anything and everything we say and do is proof Islam is under attack.
Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, identifies the wide acceptance of the victimization narrative as a major factor fueling terrorism. As he writes in his memoir, “A Journey,” actual terrorists “are small in number, but their narrative . . . has a far bigger hold.”
He says Muslim political leadership often “feels impelled to go along with this narrative for fear of losing support.”
Or their heads.
Blair sees President Obama’s outreach to the Muslim world as ambiguous at best. Writing of Obama’s Cairo speech last year, he says, “It was in part an apology, and taken as such. The implicit message was: We have been disrespectful and arrogant.”
However, he adds: “The trouble is, respectful of what, exactly?” Respect for Islam “should not mean respectful of the underlying narrative.”
He suggests Obama has work to do. “It is the narrative that has to be assailed,” he argues. “It should not be respected. It should be confronted, disagreed with, argued against on grounds of politics, security and religion.”
As Obama nears the halfway mark of his term, it is obvious his soft engagement with Iran has failed and his bended-knee plea to Arab governments has yielded little help in the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban.
The result is a growing terror threat at home and abroad. Just in time, Blair has offered a better path forward. The question now is whether Obama will rise above his personal pride and misguided ideology to embrace it.
I hope he does, but fear he won’t.
RELATED:
Untangling the Bizarre CIA Links to the Ground Zero Mosque
O’Reilly: Muslims That Question 9/11 Could Be Terrorists
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Recent Stories
Recent Comments
- Gawker: Chief of CIA’s Global Jihad Unit Revealed Online
- "9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip" - A Participant's Perspective
- Identity of CIA Officer Behind 9/11 & Torture Cases Revealed
- "9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip" - A Participant's Perspective
- "9/11 Conspiracy Roadtrip" - A Participant's Perspective
- Who Funded 9/11? Families & Insurers Still Want Answers
- Sibel Edmonds Interviews Paul Thompson
We are now seen as “the same kind of people who celebrated as the towers and the Pentagon were burning.”
Can you think of anyone in the 9/11 Truth Movement that could be used to show as an example of this? I can.
As for “deflecting Muslim guilt.” I do it often and always. 9/11 wasn’t a “muslim crime.” Just as it wasn’t a “Zionist crime, American crime, Jewish crime, Saudi Arabian crime,” etc… and so on. You hold the individuals responsible, accountable, and not their entire religion, nationality, or ideology. Too many people that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks have been brutally murdered already.
I find myself just as often trying to deflect the idea that 9/11 was a “Zionist crime” (as that it was a “Muslim crime”) and/or that the Truth Movement is based on the belief that it was a Zionist crime, or that “the Mossad did it.” This seems to me to have been the “word put out on the street” initially, very early-on… one or two days into the 9/11 scenario the media were reporting that many Jewish workers in the towers hadn’t shown up for work that day — if one accepted that story at face value, one could extrapolate that “they must have known something.” Cass Sunstein promotes his rationale for nipping “Truther” activities in the bud, in part, as being because of assumptions that the Truth Movement blames Israel for 9/11, and is antisemitic, and of course our dear friends at SPLC wave off the Truth Movement as blaming Israel, and therefore being completely baseless and ungrounded in “fact,” (which, of course, makes THEM completely baseless and ungrounded in “fact” — but who are we to point that out), and SPLC, I think, is playing on (and taking advantage of) some very deep fears on the part of their constituents to keep them from going over the line into the questioning mode…. To my mind, this is all disinformational… intended to rile, confuse, discomfit and boggle… The “boogeyman” is the “other,” no matter whether the “other” is UBL, the Muslims or the Zionists (or whoever-else, as you point out, Jon), and people are probably pretty inclined to believe the worst of whichever “other” most fits their concept of a personally threatening group. Anything to keep the masses riled up and living in fear, instead of pointing them in the direction of stepping back and putting some of that energy into questioning (or allowing it to dawn upon them) whether anything in the official story actually makes any sense at all.
Well said, Marianna.
RELATED:
Untangling the Bizarre CIA Links to the Ground Zero Mosque
O’Reilly: Muslims That Question 9/11 Could Be Terrorists